+jaypit Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Tried this in another thread and didn't get much of a response. I noticed about a week ago that GC had finally included a means of identifing caches that I have found or own. Thank you, thank you, thank you. However, when I have a map showing more than 20 caches, and I go to the 2nd, 3rd, etc, etc set of caches, that information is not shown. Has anybody else noticed this? My browser is Netscape 7.2. Link to comment
+jaypit Posted July 5, 2006 Author Share Posted July 5, 2006 I just tried it with I.E. and it's the same thing. Link to comment
Pythagoras6(MM) Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 (edited) Just curious what is going on with the Google Maps feature. I've used it once before, but it is no longer displaying the caches on the map. It seems that it only works with certain browsers. Internet Explorer is fine, but Firefox is not supported. Unsure about Netscape. Any way to get the compatibility improved? Edited July 5, 2006 by Pythagoras6(MM) Link to comment
+LeGodFather Posted July 6, 2006 Share Posted July 6, 2006 Just curious what is going on with the Google Maps feature. I've used it once before, but it is no longer displaying the caches on the map. It seems that it only works with certain browsers. Internet Explorer is fine, but Firefox is not supported. Unsure about Netscape. Any way to get the compatibility improved? I use FireFox and it works fine.. Link to comment
+Hynr Posted July 6, 2006 Share Posted July 6, 2006 I too, have no trouble with FireFox (ver 1.5.0.3). I am testing off the PQ list page clicking on the new "Preview in Google Maps" icon. Link to comment
+Team yGEOh Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 For Firefox users: If you are using adblock or adblock plus add the following line to the adblock/adblock plus filter list: @@www.geocaching.com/seek This whitelists "www.geocaching.com/seek" and will allow the caches to be viewed. Link to comment
Pythagoras6(MM) Posted July 7, 2006 Share Posted July 7, 2006 Ah. Thank you. That was definately the problem. Link to comment
Recommended Posts