+5¢ Posted August 18, 2004 Author Share Posted August 18, 2004 How is it not fair. Everyone has a chance to go caching when they want. Team could be drafted from the pool of people wanting to play. Unfound cache density, and other statistics could be taken into consideration by the drafters. Anyone playing could walk away at anytime if they didn't like it. If it became apparent teams were unfair a vote of the players could be made to even out the sides. Everyone seems to want to make this more difficult than it really is and the ones making this so difficult seem to be the ones who don't even want to play. Link to comment
+5¢ Posted August 18, 2004 Author Share Posted August 18, 2004 Crouching tiger 3 out of how many cachers does not make the consensus. Especially when 2 are caching buddies who go out and cache together. Link to comment
+Crouching Hiker, Hidden Cache Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 Crouching Hiker, fyi... Hard to form a real consensus in the caching community when less than 5% are polled. What's the cut-off limit for the number of people that don't want their caches hunted, before the idea is considered "bad"? I'm not into debates myself, just adding some things to think about.... Link to comment
+Team GPSaxophone Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 Crouching tiger 3 out of how many cachers does not make the consensus. Especially when 2 are caching buddies who go out and cache together. I've never even met Mopar, if that's who you are referring to. He lives roughly 2000 miles away from me, so it would be hard to get together for caching anyway. Link to comment
+CO Admin Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 Way to Many personal attacks on this thread, take it outside or to e-mails. This thread is closed. Respect: Respect the guidelines for forum usage, and site usage. Respect Groundspeak, its employees, volunteers, yourself, fellow community members, and guests on these boards. Whether a community member has one post or 5,000 posts, they deserve the same respect. Personal Attacks and Flames will not be tolerated. If you want to praise or criticize, give examples as to why it is good or bad, general attacks on a person or idea will not be tolerated. Link to comment
Recommended Posts