+Super_Nate Posted December 6, 2008 Posted December 6, 2008 You might see the log from 100-m away but it's not a find until you locate the match-safe in the hole. I wonder what cache you found inspired that comment! Quote
+chuckwagon101 Posted December 6, 2008 Posted December 6, 2008 It doesn't matter about the size or name of the cache as long as it has as it's signature........A BIG PILE OF STICKS! You can take the cacher out of the sticks.....but you can't take the Big Pile of Sticks out of the cacher! Quote
+The Cachster Posted December 6, 2008 Posted December 6, 2008 No, 'micro' size attribute covers the entire type! I think it would be a logical evolution. THERE Seems to be a lot of argument but i am with Clan Riffster Quote
+JacobBarlow Posted December 8, 2008 Posted December 8, 2008 I just consider micros and nanos the same thing, it makes life simple. I do wish people had to list a size though, it makes the hunt much more fun. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.