Jump to content

pingurus

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    156
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pingurus

  1. QMapShack kann das seit diesem Frühjahr auch (kleiner disclaimer: ich hab das implementiert ;) )

     

    On 10/27/2020 at 8:38 PM, frostengel said:

    Willst du die

    a) kürzeste Strecke

    b) schnellste Strecke

    c) schönste Strecke (mehr Wanderwege, weniger Straße?!)

    d) weniger Hügel (für Fahrradfahrer durchaus ein Kriterium)

    usw.

     

    Dieses Problem lässt sich (mehr oder weniger gut) durch Verwendung eines auf die eigenen Wünsche angepassten BRouter Profils in QMapShack lösen.

  2. 22 hours ago, Viajero Perdido said:

    Also, Groundspeak could simply make a conscious effort to deliberately break that app, because it puts an unusually high load on the servers.  I don't think they've done so yet, but they certainly could. 

    I think I read they once did some years ago, but then couldn't or didn't want to keep it up. But I can't give any source to that nor was I around at that time.

  3. 1 hour ago, Mausebiber said:

    Ist dir eigentlich klar, dass es neben Geocaching.com noch weitere Seiten gibt auf denen Cache gelistet werden.  Nachdem du das Döschen mitgenommen hast solltest du auch auf den anderen Seiten mal nachsehen, ob es an dieser Stelle wirklich nichts gibt.

     

    Stimmt, daran hatte ich auch nicht gedacht

  4. Am einfachsten ist es, wenn du einen GC Code in der Dose findest, dann ist dir Seite des zugehörigen Geocaches coord.info/GCXXXX

    Ansonsten kannst du natürlich auch das Profil von den Findern raussuchen und bis 2015 zurück scrollen bis du ihre Funde an dem Tag an dem sie den Cache gefunden siehst.

  5. The second one from your list does everything you want to (I am not sure about routing) and is free and open source, however it violates Groundspeaks Terms of Use.

    The other possibility that can definitely do everything you want is "Locus Maps" (as @kunarion already mentioned) with the Geocaching Add-On. Routing (using brouter), Maps (if you don't take their maps but those from OpenAndroMaps.org) and Geocaching (mostly) is free, however to log from the app you have to pay.

  6. When I try to access any page on geocaching, I get thrown to the sign in page and after I entered username and password the page just loads. Sometimes I get a server error 500, sometimes it will try to load endlessly.

     

    Does anybody else get this?

    • Upvote 2
  7. On 3/27/2019 at 6:03 PM, 3Teas said:

    My two cents:

    As mentioned before; there are many "older" cachers who use a GPSr rather than a smartphone for GCing.

    When traveling internationally using Data on your smartphone can also be very expensive; in my travels to Events I rely on WiFi connections at the Hotel for Data. I would log the Lab Caches from my laptop in the evening. Having the GPX also allows for loading them easily on my Car GPSr.

     

    How will offline finding of Lab Caches be addressed?

     

     

     

    Not only the older ones ?

  8. 2 hours ago, Touchstone said:

    This is one aspect of the Terrain Rating that I've given some thought to recently, which has always seemed a somewhat blunt instrument to reflect the true effort involved.  We have one park near me that covers a prominent ridge line, with upwards of 100 cache of various Terrain levels.   The ones at the start of the hikes, tend to be predictably  1-2 Star Terrain, while the ones at the top of the ridge that might require 3 miles of hiking and 1,500 feet of elevation gain, are in the 3 Star Terrain category, with a smattering of 4 Star Terrain, for no particular reason.  The other aspect that I considered kind of odd, is that once I gain the ridgecrest, it's a relatively insignificant effort to go between all these 3 Star Terrain caches along the top of the ridge, while picking up some of the 1-2 Star Terrain caches at the end of my hike when I'm exhausted and dehydrated, might end up taking more effort than the ones at the top of the ridge.  My thought was that one way to equal out this process is to include heart rate monitor data, so that the Terrain reflects the true effort, rather than some fictional metric that really doesn't have much bearing on reality. 

     

    I think including heartrate data is a bit of an overkill. Also, if I do 10 100m sprints and then look for a park and grab, from the heartrate it would be T4.5, but that has nothing to do with how hard it was to get to the Cache.

    I think the current system works pretty well. (I only had Geocaches yet, on which I would have put a lower T rating) However, if it isn't in the description anymore, I think it should be put back, that terrain rating includes how you reach the Cache once at the coordinates.

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...