puczmeloun

1) Mentioned above - not so correct coordinates, moved cache etc. 2) For geocache betatesting/creating - how far are final caches - you can't remember all of them and you need exactly these 160 meters (especially in city centres). 3) If I solve cache (letterbox, Wherigo) and final cache is so far - so to save final coordinates as with multi or mystery for next day/trip... 4) For friends if calling and asking me for checking their coordinates, that he/she can't find and need just help... And you can find many other reasons...

I know that i can, I'm even active user of GSAK, but when is possible to change coordinates directly at gc.com website of mystery and multi caches, why not the rest? Especially when it's already programmed. Another reason is, that I don't have my PC with GSAK database (or copied database of GSAK to Locus on android) with me, but servers of Groundspeak are just simply reachable from everywhere...

No response from HQ of Groundspeak? It will be really usable and i think not so hard to implement...

+ still no "active" clickable icons of waymarks + street view is still gone (it worked for +- 3 months and this function disapearred with Seattle bug)

Well, now it is centering in the middle of the ocean at 0°,0° instead of Seattle. Guess it needs more of a pause. I wanted to post here same info. Now no more Seattle but middle of Pacific near Howland and Baker island...

Still no change P.S.: You're welcome lumbricus for filling your review queue

Don't worry That bug is still there... Last days during creation process is like 75% Seattle, now review and still no change...

Hey Groundspeak. I'm so sorry, but this starting to be really crazy. I seriously don't understand, why you using your IT "powers" for making I "love" Geocaching thing for who nobody called and at website of officially declared successor of virtual caches* nobody can do anything with map, which is seriously one of the most important things for coordinate based game. I don't even speak about classical W-E problem (couple of years?) any many more mentioned bugs in other topics. I were really happy when you changed the map to the new version, where was possible to use street-view, really usefull for review process. But something happened and now street-view is gone, icons are not clickable and map is in Seattle? I don't know and I don't understand such policy... And you are so surprised, that there's not so much waymarkers as geocachers? Oh wait... This really is not so sustainable status... Thanks, puczmeloun *If you'll look, it is used and repeared in every topic calling for return of virtual and webcam caches as official argument.

Hilarious. That escalated quickly

New category - http://www.Waymarking.com/cat/details.aspx?f=1&guid=1a37b8c9-1543-408b-a35d-0c7a84a21633 Could somebody make it "nicer"?

Due to previous post just making it clearer - I'm using Firefox and sometimes Chrome. In both browsers is Seattle issue sometimes (50/50) visible...

Hope that it will be really full integration, when cache page will be like normal cache, just with another icon. Remembered GS Challenges, where lack of classical GC tools and information were their main problem...

It happened exactly at time you corrected "searching from centre" bug. But at same time not just "Seattle issue" appeared, but street view disappeared and icons in that map are no more clickable. So it looks as something bigger... And when is Seattle showing and when normal map? I have no idea, but when Seattle appears, I have to go to map, move with it little bit (inside map window) and refresh whole page. If I just refresh, Seattle is still there...

But as I said, it's not just Seattle problem (and not, sometimes refresh is not helping), it's also lack of Streetview and not clickable icons on that map. And still nothing is happening "Full replacement" for virtual caches...

So I noticed another problem 1) No streetview 2) Seattle (sometimes even refreshing of page doesn't work) + 3) Icons of waymarks are not "clickable" in new map... Please, if GS doesn't want to bring us back virtuals and webcams and it is pointing to the Waymarking website, so why they don't work on that

+ It happened today couple of times, that map showed me Seatle instead of cache location.

Heeeey - i realized that "Search from here" is now working, but Street View - so great for review process - disappeared... Please give us back Street View option

Unfortunately I don't think so... It could be done by ignoring the rest of Waymarking categories...

1) Have you tried? 2) I were trying to find some category too, but at the end it ended as this ;-) http://www.Waymarkin...Istanbul_Turkey 3) Do you have picture? 4) In Turkey as country full of such places, i were trying too, but only usable category after all is "city parks"

So bombardement in cities of: - Czestochowa (240 027) - Chorzów (112 749) - Sosnowiec ( 218 422) - Tychy (132 600) - Tarnowskie gory (60 000) - Pszczyna (25 415) (+ some of cities around with not enough of waymarks for challenge and biggest city of Katowice, where some waymarks was even before)

Interesting - so I sent another email to "The Blue Quasar" - new "emperor". Hope this category will be again active

Even some of the officers are active, nothing is happening with category Monarchs of the World. I sent last week mail to the leader and yesterday to Checkmark. Hope it will move little bit

It is caused maybe by some of the recent moving of database, but i've found out, that some of the pictures at geocaching.com disappeared. Example 1: Picture "Hint na Boreckych rybnicich " - www.geocaching.com/seek/gallery.aspx?guid=86c6777d-f252-48a5-8687-d3ac3e21f407 Example 2: http://www.geocachin...26-1bc71bf7df56 Is it somehow repairable?

Thanks Rikitan for all the arguments you posted, cause they are more than valid. But just to say, why it all started. It was me who let the group vote about this waymark and reason is pretty simple. I remember when my waymarks were declined due to same reason, even before i were officer in this category. So I'm so sorry, I behaved just according to my previous experiences. BUT you (Torgut) are more than right, that there's nowhere in description written anything about photo of all the slats + remember also reason of not approving of two signage posts due to their "so close" location. I were even trying to speak with leader of category to make it all clear (+ together with special rules for touristic signs in CZ, SK, GE...), it could be half an year, something change but questions are still above this - in reality pretty easy - category. So what can I do sometimes? Maybe you can write to the leader of our group and ask him for reevaluating of this waymark or for making description more "descriptive"...

Monuments Historiques - was waiting for Rakeinthecache to say that is what he wanted Spanish Heritage - That one shows updated in Lumbricus's grid Framed view - Also shows updated on grid Coins - that one kind of snuck in on me as I had done an upload earlier on that category. I will update with the newer one. Tourist marks - Also showing updated on the grid. no all are new, cleared or little bit changed so please update all