pmaupin

If you want it I can leave the group, I have already told you several times that it poses a problem for me this restriction. I'm not limited, I had a waymark of validated in the category and you asked me archived, what I did to respect you. As you engage in a conversation on the forum it is normal that we can express ourselves.

Why make this kind of restriction, a monument listed in Unesco is primarily a national monument, built by the inhabitants of this country so first a national pride for a country, which is shared later with the rest of the planet, so why take away this pride from a people?

Very nice presentation

The means of translation are now at the forefront, so the language barrier does not pose any more problems, it is a category that was missing, it is very well built and the discussion on the forum allowed to advance the assembly, I vote for a big yes.

I'm not very good at HTML, so I prepared a template for my waymarks in word, and I just have to copy what I prepare and stick in my waymark, it's true that the color brings a little more gaiety in the presentation, I must thank "BK-Hunters" for its beautiful presentations.

thank you very much, I have already published in "Wikipedia Entries", but I'm looking for another category that really shows this exceptional point as the border between two ocean. Thank you very much, I tried, I wait for the answer

I do not think so I will try, thank you

Hello community, first of all a little early, I wish you a happy new year for the year to come, that you find and publish full of new quality waymark as you know so well. I recently found a lighthouse that marks the separation between the North Sea and the Channel, I have already placed in the category of lighthouses, but is there a category that marks the separation between two seas?

A beautiful Christmas tale, Merry Christmas and keep us dreaming with your beautiful waymark. Philippe

A very nice achievement, Merry Christmas to all Philippe

Congratulations YoSam, very good job. I'm still far from this results with only 2200 waymarks. [:)] [:)] [:)]

Congratulations, very nice work

congratulations

The amount I take allows me to sort the multiple angles I took, but it is true that it is necessary to take an inner photo (when possible, of course), we can not always take a full photo of the facade when the building is in a narrow street

For my future waymark I always oblige myself to make at least 4 photos, it is unfortunately not always of excellent quality, but it is important to present at best what is described

The problem is that every year there are restaurants that lose their stars, so the waymark does not exist anymore, what will you do then?

The idea can be very good, but you know you must not be rich to eat in a Michelin star

A superb work, very complete, very well documented, the category is very clear, thank you "Benchmark Blasterz" Philippe

I think the description to include a waymark is complete and very understandable

I also am an officer of this category, and I would also prefer the second suggestion, this allows to link Waymarking and geocaching and it is beautiful work

I just wanted to say that one officer of one category had sent me to another, and that in the other an officer had sent me back to the first one, hence the idea of a ball coming and going

Yes but the officers can not throw the ball "it's not in the right category it's in the other"

This is the explanation for the refusal " We are only looking for UTILITY BOXES, not UTILITY BUILDINGS. If a structure has a human-size door intended for human entry into the structure, then it cannot be waymarked here."

Good evening This wyamark has been refused in two different categories: "Murals" and "Artistically Decorated Utility Boxes" what do you think and what should I do. thank you

C'est celui de Chambord, j'ai exactement la même photo