I did not remove this cache, instead I resisted it on another caching site.
Why won't Groundspeak discuss the account of someone who left the game , archived their caches and, left all of them in the field thereby disrespecting the game , and Groundspeak want to "protect" this guy!
So some muggle stumbles across this cache- (now litter) with Groundspeak"s name all over it, and leaving an imprint of "a game where players leave their rubbish everywhere".
Groundspeak need to take ownership of these situations, not hide behind "cannot discuss .. Blah blah"
They do not have any proper policy in their rules, just by the fact that one of their help staff easily and willingly unlocked a cache, whilst another refuses to discuss.
As a paying member (of which the CO of said cache is not) I think I'm entitled to at least discuss this with them, rather than the response I got .
In a few years time this cache would become just as old as I the original caches placed, why is their no effort by Groundspeak to look after these old caches too ?