Jump to content

xandrej

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by xandrej

  1. 1 and 1/4 year and timer is still running... BTW: what are those Favorites good for, if there is missing such basic and simple functionality?
  2. Those statements have everything to do with this issue, since the schema would need to be 'updated' to include the FP information. Originator of this topic did not ask to have FP in generated PQ gpx file. He asked to have just filter on frontend (PQ creation site), so resulted PQ file will include just caches with relevant FP count.
  3. Status looks to be for more than half year still the same. We will not get it as GS ignores us and is not even able to reply to this topic (I do not count replies about GPX schema as relevant ones, as this topic has nothing to do with GPX schema).
  4. Maybe you did not notice original request here. topi20 was not asking for new GPX file format or whatever like that. topi20 asked you for filtering caches by Favorites in PQ. It means by simple words to add one more condition to "New Pocket Query" page ( http://www.geocachin...et/gcquery.aspx ) where we can enter number with minimum Favorite points and only caches with more or equal Favorites will be filtered to PQ result. Please, do not hide this issue by GPX schema changes. Especially, If you are not able to generate correct gpx files that will work with current hardware&software. Do not expect Garmin or whoever will update their hardware (firmware) for you BTW: I can live well with 1.0.1 format and my old Colorado. No issues I have. And I see also attributes, which are originaly not shown by Colorado, as my software will move them from "not vissible attribute for Garmin" to cache description...
  5. And what does it mean "shortly"? Because I am waiting for this feature since Favorites introduction - more than one year! If I remeber well, it was one of TOP voted required features in your forum with voting...
  6. You're assuming that everyone is viewing the site on a computer with a large monitor and unlimited bandwidth. The reality is that lots of people view the site on a small laptop or mobile phone, and/or are in a country where they pay for every byte they download. Why force everyone to download multi-megapixel pictures when a thumbnail will do just fine in the majority of the cases. If the picture is of interest, and the user has the bandwidth, they can click through to see the larger version. I am not forcing anybody to download multi-megapixel pictures, I am suggesting solution - preferencies setting, so everobody can do as he likes/can, as this new behaviour is downgrade of functionality for me. Sweeney Toddlers also suggested solution with "see full sized image".
  7. This new image resizing behaviour is strange for me, too. I want to see picture (and I want other users to see my picture) as it was uploaded. I do not want to see damaged, shrinked picture with poor quality. I know, there is possibility to see it as it was uploaded, but try to do it for 20 pictures in one log. You will click your mouse button to death and waste lots of time. This is not good design at all. If you want to have this fancy image resizing (after clicking on pic link in listing/gallery) to "unify" displaying of all pics, please consider to add user setting (simple check box "I want to see always original pictures"), which will disable it and display always original pictures. Please, do not damage user creativity and will to share their pics with your "website design". Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...