captain.ron

Didn't even pick up the thing it MIGHT have been, but it's still a find?

This just logged for a CITO: Gives a whole new meaning to drive-by caching. doesn't it?

Hey, can I use this one, too? "I was kinda speeding." "I kinda stole the money."

Hardly seems like a thing for a 5ker to do. Does that tell you something about how they became a 5ker?

Yes, it was pretty difficult for the rest of us, but not if you helped hide it and logged your smiley 2 days before the cache was published.

This just amazes me. Cacher states twice that he didn't find it, then logs a "found it." He's obviously writing in English but seems to have no command of the language whatsoever. Wait, I've got it: Perhaps in his world, two "couldn't find it"s equals a "found it." Sort of like a double negative.

Wow, no kidding? That's the first time I've personally encountered this particular behavior. Perhaps I should get out more! Thanks for the insight.

I can't even begin to understand the "logic" of this one: This is from a well-concealed urban nano-cache with many DNFs but also several finds, both before and after this bizarre post. I was lucky to snag the FTF on this clever hide, but now it's a little unclear (at least to me) just which container the subsequent finders are actually finding.

sig again

sig test

Yes, apparently it does.

Does this thing work?