L8 Ed

January 17, 2006

Deleted by Lactodorum

January 17, 2006

Deleted by Lactodorum to remove inappropriate comments.

January 17, 2006

Deleted by Lactodorum to remove inappropriate comments.

December 31, 2005

typing without using full stops is the forum equivalent of babbling...

Quite appropriate for this forum I would say.

November 30, 2005

I'm fancying doing some kind of a bug race, women against men

I would like 50/100 women and the same men, I would then set two posting travel bugs away and see who could fill their list first

If you have men and women in your team please enter them all and say which team,

Obviously as in our house there are 3 male cachers I would mix up the names so that men or women could not sign 3 times in one posting

This will not be set off until the new year (around the time the kids go back to school)

Come on girls I know we can beat the blokes

Mandy = women

Graham = men

Jon = men

Daniel = men

sign up, sign up all the usual nutters welcome

M

Have you got shares in the Post Office, Mandy???

I kinda thought that the idea of a travel bug was to move from CACHE to CACHE in a somewhat random and hap-hazard fashion, ultimately and hopefully achieving some goal set by the bug's owner. The fun coming from not knowing where they'll end up next. Sorry, but to my mind, just posting them round the country from one person to another has little or nothing to do with geocaching

To right.

This is not Geocaching at all.

Its using a massage board to play a different game altogether.

Enough is enough.

Set up a site and play it there.

December 24, 2004

NEW

May 20, 2004

Could be this un

http://www.brillig.com/geocaching/

October 3, 2003

quote:
Originally posted by NattyBooshka:

quote:
...nearly trod on a deer as he waded through the chest high bracken

.. taken from a log in the NF in June gave the matter some urgency as far as I, amongst others, was concerned.

Some people are born great, some achieve greatness, and some just grate

Surely poetic licence is being used here. Unless of course the New Forrest deer are deaf and have no legs

September 30, 2003

quote:
Originally posted by Team AshandEs:
I doubt anyone on this board regardless of their position on virtuals thinks War Memorials are meaningless. This what I was trying to point out and nothing more.

________________________

What is caches precious?

Ok. Fair enough.

September 30, 2003

Team AshandEs said

I would have thought that this quote from the original post

Would have answered these questions for you. No one has suggested the sites you are defending are meaningless.

Eckington: There are also places; Sites of Special Scientific Interest and Ancient Monuments, War Memorials, and sites of Social or Community Interest where we think a virtual cache is appropriate. These we would approve.

what about this quote then.

quote:
Originally posted by Eckington:

Research is limited but we feel that in many USA urban areas virtual caches have become, perhaps, meaningless to a certain extent. Eckington and Lactodorum

September 18, 2003

So there you go. We are all different. Good job too. I forgot when I posted. One mans meat is another man poison. Some like the walk, some like the logbook, some are more interested in the contents. So a bad walk to a rubbish tip that has a cache with £20 pound note in would have some people in heaven. Whereas a beautiful walk to a fantastic location with a cache full of Mctat would give pleasure to others. Mind you a Good walk to a fantastic location and a 20 pound note? Any takers.

Obviously there are some out there who like sig key rings and the like. I stand corrected.

September 17, 2003

quote:
Originally posted by adrianjohn:

One cache done TNLN and you're an expert are you?

Have boots and GPSr, will cache for fun!

So you have to be an expert to see that complaining about something without doing anything about it is not improving things.

Please accept my profound apologies.

September 10, 2003

quote:
Originally posted by Sparticus:

Onwards and upwards. Never retreat, never surrender.

HA not on this message board.

September 2, 2003

quote:
Originally posted by Team Blitz:
In most cases it was "took nowt, left one of our keyrings".

So, whilst the locations were reasonable, the cache boxes themselves were very uninspiring.

Paul

Another proud member of the GAGB!

And after your visit they improved dramatically (A Key Ring WOW)

Why not a Gold watch or a diamond ring.

If YOU had put something in worthwhile I may have sympathized with you.

July 31, 2003

QUOTE]

Rubbish!

The service is the website the caches are the content.

I don't agree. Anyone who places a cache is doing a service to other cachers. GC.com is a place you can advertise them free.

BT offer a service, They advertise in all forms of media even media that has pulled them to bits in the past.

People who get into the soap box have their say and leave do not deserve to be taken seriously in my view.

July 31, 2003

If you don't like your phone company you change to another one. That's all I've done.

No it is not.As you are the provider of the Caches you place. You do not pay anything for this.And you deprive people who use GC.com of your caches. So if its a bit like anything, it's like BT taking the hump, and cutting you off because you said that you were not happy with the service.

July 31, 2003

If you don’t play my way I’m not playing ether and you’re not using my ball. I hear that in the school yard said by 5 to 10 year olds.

Certain people have said this regarding geocaching several time when things don’t go as they want. Why do they do it? Is it to get “please don’t go” posts.

Either that or you do not have the courage of your convictions.

Moss has quit or threatened to quit at least three times because he was not getting his way. (going way back to the commercial caching debate GC.com allowed it Moss threatened to take his ball in.)

Tim and June I think three times as well

Icenians quit and pulled off their caches from GC.com.

There have been others.

I thought these people were adults I now have my doubts.

Perhaps they are just 7 year olds masquerading as grown ups.

I feel another guideline coming on. No cache must be placed that these people can’t get to in their prams.

July 8, 2003

I don't approve of glass containers, nor do I approve of making up the rules. Glass containers are allowed so until the guidelines are changed allow them. An approver should stick to the guidelines when approving caches not do it as they see fit.

L8 Ed is NOT a Member or Supporter of Geocaching Association of Great Britain.

July 7, 2003

Marmite it has to be Marmite.

L8 Ed is NOT a Member or Supporter of Geocaching Association of Great Britain.

July 3, 2003

Have they gone?

L8 Ed is NOT a Member or Supporter of Geocaching Association of Great Britain.

July 2, 2003

quote:
Originally posted by The Hungry Caterpillars:
Sorry to have to admit this L8Ed but being a bit thick could you tell me what all those*** *** ****** stand for or are they too naughty to translate. I ask just to make sure that you are not a member of GAGB and the *s do not qualify the statement in any way

Dont know why these *** came up. There was no text that they replaced. I tryed to remove them to no avail. changed sig lets see if they have gone.