Jump to content

richlv

Members
  • Posts

    39
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by richlv

  1. On 12/16/2023 at 12:37 AM, flosse66 said:

    My wife is premium, I log in with her account, open the caches in the browser under her name, switch to my accoubt on an additional cache. If I then ckick "log cache", the log premium log page opens in my name and I can log. If I refresh, I get kicked out.

    You might want to use a feature like Firefox containers - use a different container for different users. That way cookies are not mixed between sessions.

    What you are likely doing is logging everything in your name, if that is a single browser session.

  2. I always used the "old" logging form, and it nicely preserved the previously selected date (until day change in the USA, I believe).

    It looks like the "old" form has been removed now (don't see the opt out link anymore), and I'm stuck with the new form, which does not preserve the date.

     

    Can we please get the old form back? It worked better :)

  3. There are multiple forum topics about seeing a list of found caches in the webpage.

    I'd like to get a list of all my found caches - primarily interested in the GC codes, and would be happy with a plaintext, CSV or similar file.

    Can I get something like that as a download, from API or in a similar manner?

     

    Preferably simple (to avoid website scraping) and without extra expenses.

    • Upvote 1
  4. Seeing the same problem with Firefox. Shift+Enter does not work. Pasting some text with a newline in it can rasult in the unfinished message being posted 3 times in a row.

  5. In an older version of Firefox, the new map (/play/map) is a blank page. Not sure whether related, but console shows:

    mutating the [[Prototype]] of an object will cause your code to run very slowly; instead create the object with the correct initial [[Prototype]] value using Object.create    mapbox-gl.js:29:6520
    SyntaxError: let is a reserved identifier    vendor.c8643ec5d6d1f0f96541.js:2:603822

    The "old" map (/map) works.

    • Helpful 1
  6. I like older caches. I also try to help with the maintenance of them, and with as god container as I possibly can. While I can see the argument of drop-and-forget caches seeming to be encouraged, in most cases it's a good reason why the owner might be unable to do so - it's often moving away, health issues or death (yes, GC has been around enough for many members to have... expired).

    I like those caches because I see the opposite - drop-forget-drop-a-new-one - as a much bigger issue. There are some prolific cache authors who, while their efforts are appreciated, do not seem to care for the longevity of their caches at all. You can find cache comments like "oh, archiving this one so I can hide a new one at this same place so my friends can get a new find". Wat?

    Old caches are great and highlighting them would be nice.

    Perhaps the opposite is needed, too. GC recently offered a chance to place new virtual caches to cache owners whose caches had many favourites (or something, the criteria was secret). That seemed like a great idea to discourage the "cache droppers". Perhaps something opposite could happen to cache "unmaintainers" - if many of your caches get disabled/archived, you don't get to hide new ones, or your find number is halved, or something :)

  7. MartyBartfast, thank you - i had indeed overlooked that option and it solves the biggest issue.

    still, as cezanne notes, cache pages (and trackable map, although that one is less of an issue) is google maps now - and i'm fairly surprised by how much better osm is...

×
×
  • Create New...