There is another "treasure hunting" game, that we all know about, that has used technology to basically eliminate the questionable finds that are being discussed in this thread. Logging a find is only possible by having the target in front of you. I guess there are ways to cheat but you would need to know somebody who is going to the hide, have them agree to help you cheat, and then you would need to give them your phone for a day. Certainly more difficult than simply sitting at your computer and logging a find by proxy.
This newer activity has been gaining momentum at an alarming pace and until recently, I couldn't figure out why. Maybe this thread is part of the reason.
I don't really have an issue with the cheaters personally but it does diminish the value of actually going out and finding a cache yourself. To some more than others.
I can't help but think that writing in a physical log with a pen is un-necessary and archaic. I feel the the geocaching heirarchy needs to develop a way to make it necessary to actually be at the cache in order to log it. The honor system is noble in theory, but as more people join the game, the number of dishonorable individuals will also increase and discredit the honest finders who work so hard to maintain a level of legitimacy to the game. Eventually, all the true players, the ones who are out there hacking through the woods, diving in the hedges, or climbing the mountains, will migrate to the game that gives validity to their effort.
Or maybe not. Maybe the limitless flexibility, self-policing mentality, and a loosely upheld rulebook that allows or even encourages rule bending, are what make geocaching so popular to so many.
I will be watching closely as this "other game" works overcome the "no signal" issue. At that point, it will become very interesting.