jan wagner

But I like to play it with other families having a pastime. I don't like cheaters trying to pose as better players. Geocaching with decent people, not with imposters.

When you go to log that cache there are several options. The big two are "Found It" and "Didn't Find It". If you you didn't find the cache, yet you choose "Found It", how exactly should that be framed?Perhaps with a little humor, compassion, or understanding. This is a game. When you throw out terms like 'liar' and 'cheater' you are making more out of it than it deserves and causing people who have come to respect you over the years to see you as a crank. Are you a liar yourself and don't like the feeling of being one?

will it be bribing if a briber offers a bribe and a briber accepts? I think yes

Multiple logs are fine if the cache is designed to be logged multiple times. There is nothing wrong with multiple logs on a cache and your lack of multiple logs does nothing to improve the quality of your smilies. .... You are advancing the "my smilies are better" theory and it isn't warranted. but multiple founds on simple caches like 17 times logging a find like lynn (17000 ++ "finds" ) are simply cheating. My smililies are better than the smilies of any cheater, as they are honest

Uh.... The spelling? An MIA is an MIA And a cheater is a cheater. Be at least honest enough to admit that you cheat.

And if it were in Antarctica: You did not find it That makes you an impostor. My honest points look not as valuable as they are as someone else can not easily see that your many points are cheating while mine (fewer) are honest. You are still a cheater defacing the value of honest cachers.