Thank you BlueRajah a concise reply that explains the situation, another suggestion, if the reviewer was to review your cache but not publish it leaving the cache owner to publish once given the go ahead by the reviewer, reason for this suggestion, this way you could plan your cache, work out where it is to go without placing the physical cache so if the reviewer says you cant place it there because, for example, it is within 500ft of the last piece in a puzzle cache (which doesn't show up on the map) you haven't wasted time and effort in first placing the cache and secondly retrieving it....
My last cache took a lot of effort,time and not least money to construct, a bit more than another 35mm film pot or clip lock box shoved in a bush, something which the cachers around here seem to appreciate, but because the way the system works I now have to go retrieve it because it is to close to an existing cache that I had no way of knowing existed. If the review system was as I suggest I could have done the online bit, had it reviewed, the reviewer would have said Sorry chap it's to close to another cache, I could then have re planned it and come up with a solution without all the time effort ect of physically placing the cache...
