Jump to content

T0SHEA

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    2117
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by T0SHEA

  1. Unless there are other vendors of these tokens it is far too limiting (at this time) and is not global. Beside, finding a machine sounds dull, rather the locations on the coins at least would be more interesting. What is next bubble gum dispensing machines?
  2. GW Coins (only) The number following the country is total different locations COUNTRIES - 25 POLAND 18 GERMANY 14 PORTUGAL 9 AUSTRIA 22 ARGENTINA 8 COLUMBIA 7 BOSNA I HERCEGOV. 5 PALESTINE 1 ESTONIA 27 HUNGARY 21 ROMANIA 25 BULGARIA 17 LITHUANIA 6 SLOVENIA 1 IRELAND 1 MACEDONIA 1 CZECH REPUBLIC 1 FINLAND 3 KOREA 4 LEBANON 1 JORDAN 2 RUSSIA 2 BELARUS 2 SLOVAKIA 3 SWEDEN 1 Total Locations 202
  3. Excuse me, no need to be rude just because I see an alternative to a new category.
  4. That was to approve a submission, there is only one after that. There are only 45 approved waymarks, how active can they be. date created:4/9/2006
  5. Ask wayfrog for assistance, and promote a new leader or officer. Or contact Groundspeak direct and ask for assistance.
  6. Am I understanding you correctly that this a NEW proposal, and not an expansion of Norway Historical Sites? From your description: "Also probably Norway (even though there is already a category on historic waymarks)" WHY? This needs to be the FIRST consideration. Just recently, UNESCO Biospheres was expanded to also include Geoparks.
  7. The category was created "date created:4/9/2006" with "Total Records: 45" The category is active over 14 years with an average of about 3 submissions a year. It needs expanding.
  8. Are you talking about Norway Historical Sites ? If so, there are 10 officers. Joined the group and it appears to me that at least two officers are active, and wayfrog has approved just a few. If I am mistaken, please explain it to me.
  9. Not necessary, just checked and it is now gone. As far as I know, I did nothing for this to happen. Regardless, I'm happy. Thanks for all that responded to this topic. Hopefully the remaining waymarks will get resolved.
  10. I am still unable to remove the visit, for some reason two are now gone. The third seems blocked or something... Can someone help me to remove this visit. Instructions. I did check and there does not seem to be any corrupt text. The vortex one I did find the text, and removed it.
  11. bugcrowd2022_36 Category Name Waymarks Visited Birdwatching Locations 4 Histoires de France (French historical markers) 1 Vortexes, Mystery Spots, and Gravity Hills 1 Off-Leash Dog Areas 1 Washington Historical Markers 1 Vortexes, Mystery Spots, and Gravity Hills is my waymark and when I try to view it, I get this message: Please login with valid credenitals: Username: Password: However, I am able to edit it. I have tried to delete the visits, I am unable to remove them. bugcrowd2022_36 Visits
  12. Like the one that was in peer review with only two photos required? If accepted, it will be completely changed, to who knows what. There is no opportunity to review the changes, it is too late for any kind of vote to determine the merits of the proposal My concern, it will become who can campaign for the most votes, either to deny or approve. Group A has 20 votes, group B has 45 votes, group C will not be out done, they willl solicit for 75 votes and so on. If this is the new trend, Waymarking will change forever and not necessarily for the better. What is the point, why even bother with peer review. If this continues, peer review will become a mockery and we will regress to pre peer review. Of course, this is just my opinion.
  13. Yes, thank you for the reminder. I recall now. I was not aware that if I edit an approved waymark, it requires additional approval. Oh, this is interesting. I have been editing approved waymarks for about three years now removing the photobucket images that are now busted and some spelling errors. Do you suppose that every edit requires additional approval? This is the first time I have heard of this, no one has ever contacted me about the edits. I have done thousands already. As an added note, perhaps it is more to do with the bugcrowd2022_36 visits in the bird watching location, and also I did notice that there was a visit in off leash dog parks also by bugcrowd2022_36. It seem too coincidental that all problems are a result of these visits, in the same bird watching locations category.
  14. Excuse me, we need to get back on topic. There are far greater concerns...
  15. Am I understanding you correctly, that someone had put an edit request? (for changes) If this is correct, will you email me the edit request? If this is not the case, can you explain it again.
  16. Bear and Ragged, I see my waymark is on your list. White Lake Basin Biodiversity Ranch - Willowbrook, British Columbia It looks fine, and I am able to edit. As I mentioned before, this is a bird watching location waymark that has the three visits by bugcrowd2022_36 I will try to delete the visits. Just wondering, why do you need to edit my waymark?
  17. Also, curious, I have noticed that "some" categories have inactive officers. Some have not logged in to the categories for years, basically inactive. Why are these officers not being demoted, and new members promoted to officers? Also I have noticed, in a few categories, there are as many as10 to 15 officers, most inactive. If a vote is called, it usually gets "hung up". Also, sometimes, when I was new to Waymarking and joined a few groups, I was overwhelmed by being promoted to officer. I was unaware of the promotions until I started receiving notifications. At this point, I lacked the experience and understanding of the responsibilities of being an officer. I panicked, and quit the groups. My personal opinion, leaders should extend the courtesy to at least inquire if someone wants to be an officer before promoting them. Currently, as some of you are aware I follow wayfrog's approvals of inactive categories, some appear quite often over the late five years. I have joined these groups, with open enrollment, and contacted the leaders to be promoted. Almost always, I get no response and not promoted to officer. In summary, the categories remain inactive, and wayfrog continues to approved them cycle after cycle. What is the solution?
  18. I am just curious, will you also promote a new leader? I am aware of several leaders that technically have quit, however will not promote new leaders. Yet, will solicit members just for the purpose to review submissions.
  19. When the Religious Buildings Multifarious was approved, I joined every church group I could. I use my membership to verify if it is cross posted, or if I have concerns. Since I have gained knowledge by my membership in these church groups, I do not use them as often. If a submitter, states in a message, that it was declined in one of the church groups, I still verify it and read the decline notes. I do this also. I do agree with this generally, however it depends on the leaders of the categories. I routinely turn off enrollment.
  20. Is joining a group an indication of support of the concept, or is it merely arbitrary? Some members join almost all groups. Is turning off enrollment always a good idea, even with approved categories?
  21. That is interesting, this is the same message I got on a visit to a bird watching location on 11/15/2022 White Lake Basin Biodiversity Ranch - Willowbrook, British Columbia Also, when I tried to open "Bird Watching - Wynnwood Park Trails, The Colony, TX" to view, I got this same message: Please login with valid credenitals: Username: Password: The visits were by, bugcrowd2022_36
  22. Here is one Cathedral Notre Dame - 1015 to 1879 - Strasbourg, France visited on 10/31/2022 Do you recall receiving a notification? Update: I just received 4 new visits (so far) just a minute ago
  23. None in the last few days. The last one was Nov. 15, coincidentally the day I got those "Strange Visits" I posted about them. Is there a connection, no idea. I can say I get a lot of visits with some days 50 or so.
×
×
  • Create New...