Carsten

I agree. But nevertheless I would appreciate having a kind of rating system integrated in Geocaching.com. You are right saying, high quality for one cacher can mean low quality for a different cacher. So why not just calling it a recommendation? I'd prefer the mentioned TOP10 system but without a sophisticated rating scale. Every cacher can recommend a small percentage of his found caches by simply activating a check box when logging the cache: "Yes, this really was one of my all time favorite caches!". Based on this recommendations you could easily build lists like "Cachers recommending this cache also recommended the following: ...". BTDTNT

Good idea! I'd like to add two more suggestions: - add an option to hide ignored caches - add the possibility to toggle the premium member display filters using url parameters (for use in bookmarks) Thank you for taking this into consideration!

It would be helpful, if our German reviewers would just stick to the guidelines. "In general" doesn't mean "minimum". I read it this way: If there are no known local trespassing laws, a distance of 150ft is used. Otherwise the local laws apply. And since I can not see a passage in the guidelines saying "local laws only apply when requiring more than a 150ft distance" it would be fine to hide a cache closer to the railtracks as long as it complies with local laws.