cache addicts

Amen brother! It's all about what works for whoever hides the cache as long as they keep in mind it has to be findable.

Speaking from my personal experiences, I don't generally read the logs at all because I prefer to read the online logs as to avoid the biting insects. Still, why walk 10 miles for a cache you already know is a micro which you know you're not going to like? I've hidden half a dozen caches to date, 3 of those being micros. I always make the effort to at least wrap the 35mm film canister in camo duct tape if not a more intricate camo job given I have time. I enjoy the challenge of finding these little guys but agree it can be tough in a forest setting with tree cover, a more suitable cache is called for here.

It doesn't really matter on the size of the cache to me, what I find the most dissapointing aspect of geocaching are the caches that can be spotted from a fair distance away mainly due to the old pile of sticks hiding method or poorly disguished caches (ie yellow tupperware lid). I'd rather hunt down a non-camo but nicely hidden micro that the obvious larger caches. I don't understand all the micro hating going around, are people just dissapointed that the larger caches aren't being posted in their area?aren't going Bottom line - if you don't like micros, don't complain about them just ignore the cache if it's posted as a such.

Here's our micro made from a mechanical lead container.. It's part of a multicache redirect..