fishingfools

thanks for the update, looking forward to another in this great series

some jucies are acidic, like cranberry or orange, and will cause a camelback bladder to stiffen if you forget to wash the last little bit out. Happened to me, but then im not all that bright

bumpity bump

has summer shipped yet? Just Curious

i use a cheap ($35) Palm V I found on Ebay and Cachemate software. To go paerless you run a PQ, download it to GSAK, then from GSAK send it to your palm and GPS. Good Luck!

i done made me one like Team AI, it come out right nice and neat lookin

Id post a note, since it is the same GC number

Im 37. Im not old

"When in doubt, poke it with a stick"

nice, I'll take one

For every micro you don't hunt, I gonna find 3 oh and I gotta fever, a fever for more cowbell!

I got mine, and pin. looks great

It'll serve the logger right for harming the tree. I'm going to go buy a bunch of those tent pegs. I really hope you are jokeing.

Tread lightly

Congratulations, you made a chemist smile today

did you say fishing?

The ones I was talking about where the UDT ones, not at GW4, but on campus up in Dallas. From what I heard, the owner didn't like the cut and paste logs, so they where archived. It's the owners cache, and they can do whatever they wish. The caches that where brought to the event, thats an other issue. The geocaching community is somewhat self- policeing, and they community at large has decided that moving caches are not exempt from the rules. So be it, I gots no problem with that.

Can you link me to a post where that happened? I think everything I read mentioned very specific logging practices. Not blanket accusations against high number Cachers in general. How about: I have thousands of smiles, and a lot of miles on my boots. Not a sloth. oh and a couple of cheesey couch potato finds

Could we just forward all logs to you for approval? Man, there's always going to be off topic comebacks like this! Criminal is asking legitimate questions that for whatever reason, people don't want to answer. I too would like to see someone's, anyone's,,, honest opinion as to why they think these practices are ok. Not the "it shouldn't matter how i play the game" or "just mind your own beeswax" comebacks either. ok here my take, since you asked: I do not like padded numbers. I try to play within the rules, and firmly believe in 1 find per GC#, and the log must be signed to count. Have I logged pocket/temp caches at an event? Yes, I have. They have a gc# and I found them. Would I do it again? Most likely not. Several of the "real" caches we found at GW4 were archived before we could log them all. That is the owners right, and I would never log my own cache or the event twice to "make up" for the lost finds. I do not think there would be a mass exudus, because these so called cheaters are a small minority of cachers. I do resent the implication that becasue a cacher has alot of finds, he or she must be a cheater.

Could we just forward all logs to you for approval?

just make sure you get rid of the number of forums posts too @^%$%$@#*&spelling

Pile them up on the floor, them dive in and swim around in them like Scrooge McDuck

Can you post contact info the the park ofice. We could send them letters and emails requesting they change their policy. May not do anything, but a strong grassroots letter campain may get thier attention.

no doggie treats in mine, dont want the critters to get it

e mail sent