Team WilP

En gaan we dan vanaf heden met een schone lei beginnen en niet achteruit kijken? Dit om een hoop gedoe met oude caches te voorkomen, sommigen daarvan liggen er al van voor de toestemmingsregels. p.s. Van ons team zijn er inmiddels geen ingegraven caches meer.

Looking for an unactiveted Border Collie coin as a present for an other cacher. I need it before 02-12-2015. Who can help me. p.s I am living in the Netherlands

I understand, but my case was the trigger for this discussion in the Dutch cachecommunity, therefore I placed my post. My opionion, one way or the other, both cases are not desirable. You understand that I talk about my own cache. GC1288J Therefore I am possibly not for 100% objective but a little bit frustrated about it. But after I passed that feeling I still find it desirable.

On the main waypoint from a high rated muli (8km) where you have to answer 6 questions, an other CO placed a Traditional (micro). At a scienic viewpoint on poles there is one pole with a plaquette with a name on it, this is one of the questions You have to answer. In the nearestby pole another CO placed after 4 1/2 years that the Multi-cache exist a traditonal. Of course at the moment it is between the rules but it shows not many respect for the other CO to do so. At the other hand, me and a lot of other cachers find that, it should be not possible to do so. The CO that placed the micro found so far 28 traditionals and 2 Earhcaches perhaps he did not know of the excistents of that multi. But the reviewer should see this for the 0.10 miles/ 161 m rule.

Het is te hopen van niet! Kunnen mensen zelf keuzes maken en wordt niet dezelfde moraal opgelegd. Bedoel dit zowel in positief als in negatief opzicht!

We can help you to release one in the Netherlands Send a mail gr

Like the new Icon more gr.from Holland