eusty
-
Posts
1345 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by eusty
-
-
My gut is we have a lower % of missing caches than average. I'm curious to see what other people have in their areas.
A bit higher than you, but very similar.
On a 50 mile radius from my house it's 2.4%
-
OK...I lied!!
I had a couple lying about so I tried it with 8 point precision...and everything worked fine, no idea why it didn't last time
The geolocation header is 10 bytes, but if you add a comment it increases to 22. So you can use Ulralight for geolocation, although realistically you need NTAG203 to add much of a comment.
Which handy as you can use these which makes fixing easier
-
You should be able to get geolocation to work with Ultralight (46 byte) tags. You don't need that much precision (8 decimal places should be more than sufficient) so we're looking at under 40 bytes. You probably won't be able to store a name though. If you encode it as a text string, "N xx xx.xxx E xxx xx.xxx" is only 24 bytes, + 7 bytes header = 31 bytes, giving you space for a short text description.
Mmmm..yes you are correct..Ultralight! I couldn't remember what they were called so just scanned on and it came up as type 2
I tried shortening the precision to reduce the data size, but I can't remember if they didn't encode or you couldn't read them as geolocation tags. The only way I found to work was to use NTAG203 and select 'use current location', but it maybe a shortcoming of the phone/app etc
-
But remember that they can't be locked (by most phones anyway) as don't stick them 'in the wild' or someone could decided to recode it!They aren't that they are standard 1K which have eight times the space.
-
Battery Lifetime: 5-10 Minutes
No looking for nanos then....
-
Thanks. Now to await the arrival of my tags.
Hope they are NTAG203 as I couldn't get geolocation to work on Type 2 tags due to the lack of space.
-
-
His caching name would be a good idea!!!
Generally they have a cache symbol on as well. See http://www.ukgeocachers.co.uk/catalog/Geocaching-Pocket-Stamps.html
-
-
The Dakota also can access the Russian Sat's can't it?
Nope
Can it read Garmin's QR codes too?
Nope again!
-
The 18650 batteries are pretty standard, basically they stick a few of them together to make most laptop battery packs. Being Li-Ion they last for ages and a quick to rechargeThe fenix looks good, but I'm not keen on the idea of having to use specialist batteries when the Lenser uses standard AA batteries.
Every time I use the torch (like this evening) I smile to myself as it's that good!
-
I wondered if they had been deleted, but I couldn't see what was the point of deleting them.....makes sense now!
-
Not a 'How Do I..." more a 'how did they'!
There are quite a few caches (all by one cacher) which are now archived...but they've got no archive log...how come?
http://coord.info/GC399KM is one example.
-
Just updated 0.6.1a and it works fine now
Although in a cache saturated area the cache name maybe an issue I think it would be a nice option to have?
-
I had the same problem at first
You need to click on the "i" icon on the bottom left of the map (turning it blue), then left click on the map, next click on show labels
Hope this helps
Although this doesn't work using Opera :(Would it would be a better idea to put it on the main option screen?
-
I've never seen any language option either, and the website states "The Android Application is currently available in English." ...although it maybe out of date.
Did you download it from the Danish Android Market?
-
Yup but worth it!! (Although it was a present from my wife)£90 for a torch
When you put it on full it's like having a car headlight with you...makes night caching so much easier
-
Fantastic!!
Yesterday I downloaded a new map but it took hours! Kept stalling and I had to stop, then resume it again and then it would carry on downloading...painful.
Today I just downloaded it in 5 minutes
-
As the chargers are rated for the voltage then there shouldn't be an issue...just coincidence I guess that it didn't charge.
BTW Europe is 230V
-
I've found a few caches which were not all written in English.
It's a good idea to put an English translation of the cache description though.
-
-
If you can put the extra towards it then an eTrex 20 would be worth spending the extra on.
-
http://www.geocaching.com/about/guidelines.aspx#cachesaturation
The distance is between physical elements. I've two puzzle caches which are only feet apart, it's best not to stack them exactly at the same co-ordinates....just so they show on the map though.
-
However, I'm considering a GPS as they are probably more robust and waterproof.
You bet they are! Waterproof to 1m
If you like the OS maps then they are available on the eTrex. The 25k is pretty expensive although there are ways of putting them on the GPS with some hacking. 50k is more reasonable and as been mentioned OSM maps are pretty good.
I'd be temped to look at the Oregon, or better still the Montana, as the screen resolution is better than the eTrex.
NFC tags, anyone?
in GPS technology and devices
Posted · Edited by eusty
I'd be interested too
The issue I have is that the only ruggedised tags I can get are Ultralite, so restricted to 46bytes.To fit the data on a tag with a single identifier you can only have a precision of four decimal places.
geo:38.8977,-77.0366?q=38.8977,-77.0366(1)
This means a resolution of 22ft...which really isn't enough
EDIT: Going to try some of these as see how they stand up outside.