We're admittedly newbies, but have recently noted a real disparity between the difficulty & terrain ratings for a lot of caches- especially in different areas. Today we went on a hunt with 2 preschoolers, a stroller carrying a 4-month-old, a grandma and 2 able-bodied adults. We targetted 1-star terrain & 1-star-difficulty caches, yet some had us scrambling into canyons with low brush that our 5-year old couldn't manage (let alone someone with a stroller!) or crossing streams and crossing over fences.
It could sound like newbie mistakes, but in the 10 previous caches we found, a 1-star was often a drive-up cache and paved. I saw the system on geocaching.com for rating terrain & difficulty. Why don't more people use that-- and why does it seem to depend on area? (In the area near our home, 1 stars are usually paved and 2 stars are manageable with small children yet here on vacation, we're finding that 1 stars are often located in canyons and CERTAINLY off pavement!) We try to scan the logs in advance so we know what to expect, and we're certainly not trying to cache out of our league, but what else can we do-- especially when we're in an area we're not familiar with?
Interested to hearing what you have to say,
TeamTotoro