Jump to content

Odberger

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Odberger

  1. All these are half witty workarounds using the old interface... I would prefer if the new one could be fixed instead
  2. Thanks! But what happens when you click on "5" for page 5 or "Next >" for the next page or ">>" for last page?
  3. Thanks a lot! I found that old interface also, but then you can't filter on type... :-(
  4. If I go to my profile https://www.geocaching.com/p/default.aspx?tab=geocaches And then click on say the link for "Mystery Cache" where I have found 4688. I then come to a page with the header saying "3,688 results" and then a list of my last 1000 finds. I can't browse to see earlier/first finds? EDIT: Ok, if I sort on date I can get the the oldest (not the archived ones, but that is another bug right now). But still only 1000 oldest logs, I can't find the Nth oldest if N>1000 (example, find my 1500th log on a myst). And also still wrong number in the header :-) Is there an easy way to see my first N finds of the different types? Without editing the filters... And even if I set the filters to like "found before April 2014" I don't get my oldest caches in the list. I get a cache I found 2014-04-09 as the first find even if my first found myst was found by me 2013-09-16 according to Project-GC. - This seems to have to do with the problem showing archived caches in the list, so ignore this :-) And the column header "Last found" - Well, you can only find a cache once, so it could as well be called "First found", or I would suggest it should say just "Found" or "Found by user" ;-)
  5. Also quite irritating that they do a change like this and then go home for the day... Maybe they should consider a 12 or 24hrs grace period after an upgrade where there is someone on duty to fix or rollback the update when these things occur?
  6. Hopefully they'll wake up soon and press the "UNDO button" ;-)
  7. I always allow all cookies and I still have this problem... Tried again to clear cache and re-allowing all and still the problem persists
  8. I also have the same problem since about 8-10 hours. I'm on Win11 and I have tried in FireFox, Chrome and Edge with the same result. Not able to update and logs are collapsed. Clearing the cache, log off and back on, reboot, disabling all scripts... Nothing helps? However, when opening the browser in Private mode, then it looks/works as usual... The same on another computer and on the phone when using browser in desktop mode, then it's "normal"? Feels like it's something that happened on the computer I was using at the time whetever happened?!
  9. Same for me and a friend in Sweden... Anybody at HQ that can confirm that it's not working and that you are working on the issue? It would be really stupid if it's all based on Seattle time and not actual LOCAL time and dates when logging the caches for the challenges, weather it's physical or labs!
  10. Are you sure? Looking att all Virtuals, regardless which batch in this chart... So it's normal that Stockholm, with about 40% more habitants should only have 33 virtuals vs. Västra Götalands 86? Not that well distributed if you ask me...? And if it wasn't about population, then the map would be even even worse... So I guess it has something about the amout of cachers... Those exact numbers I don't have though and all I'm basing this on is population. But I've hard time thinking that the percentage of population i VG would be like 4 times higher than in Stockholm. But hey. I might be wrong! And I was just curious if some other areas had similar findings...
  11. Still quite astonished that HQ says that it was all random distribution within the different countries... In Sweden we've got 50 (fifty!) published in "Västra Götaland" and 0 (zero!) in Stockholm and the same for Skåne (zero)... Västra Götaland has only 2/3 of the population as Stockholm and Skåne is just slightly less populated than VG. Sweden has 21 regions and some are quite small population wise. 13 of those got a V3.0 published as of today. Here's the bar stats showing all published V3 in Sweden: https://project-gc.com/Statistics/CachesPerArea?country=Sweden&type[0]=Virtual Cache&hidden_fromyyyy=2022&hidden_frommm=3&hidden_fromdd=1&hidden_toyyyy=2023&hidden_tomm=12&hidden_todd=31&submit=Filter I've contacted HQ and they only answer that "yes, it's random and probably those in Stockholm and Skåne didn't publish theirs yet...." - Yeah, sure! ;-) Has the same strange distribution in geography been done in other countris also?
  12. I really hope that it will be on the weekend of September 10-11 as I will be in Aberdeen then
  13. Hi, It's very frustrating to create a new cache just to discover that it's to close to a hidden cache (stage or final of multi or myst) when you are about to publish it. I know that it's not possible to show them on the map as the fun then will be spoiled. And if you get instant notification you can triangulate a hidden cache. However, what if you could only do, say one search per day or per week. Just to get a hint about the possibility to place your cache there. I know that it's not a guarantee, as someone might put and publish a cache to close before you can publish your. That way you can at least get a NO and then you don't waste time and effort on a, from the beginning, dead end... Rgds Micke (Odberger)
  14. I wonder if there is an easy way to move and/or copy one or several caches from one list to another? I have a list called "Mysts to solve" and another called "Solved mysts" and I would like to have an easy way to mark one or several caches on one list and then just click on "Move selected caches" or "Copy selected caches" and the choose another list to where the caches should be moved/copied. Today I have to open the cache, choose bookmark and then choose to which list. Then I have to open the initial list and delete the cache (for moving). This is a feature that I would like to have on the site (if there isn't an easy way today that I'm not aware of).
×
×
  • Create New...