Walker Boh

This rocks But thanks to the Groundspeak team for changing the titles back, anyway! It's much better now.

Hi all, some time ago Groundspeak changed the overall cache description template. Before the change, the page title used to contain a very brief summary containing waypoint and cache name, being very useful for bookmarking pages using the browser's bookmark feature. NOW the page title is VERY verbose, for example: GC1408E - A Traditional Cache in Baden-Württemberg, Germany called Maria Bickesheim created by candela4 GC14409 - A Traditional Cache in Baden-Württemberg, Germany called Alela s Medizinweg created by Alela In bookmarks, or worse in the browser's history this results in GC1408E - A Traditional Cache in Ba GC14409 - A Traditional Cache in Ba Thus: every cache in the same state looks just the same, bookmarks or browser history isn't useful at all anymore Can we vote to revert this change? Groundspeak could leave the page title this verbose, but change the order. If the cache name came first, the problem would be far less severe: GC1408E Maria Bickesheim - A Traditional Cache in Baden-Württemberg, Germany created by candela4 GC14409 Alela s Medizinweg - A Traditional Cache in Baden-Württemberg, Germany created by Alela Opinions? P.S. I'm posting this issue here, because Groundspeak support told me to

If anyone still cares: I'm not receiving any notifications either. And my mailbox is located at a quite small internet provider in Germany. I.e. this is not a problem of some "big" mail provider's anti-spam measures ...

Well it worked! I even could delete the extra log entry without effecting the database status. Case closed

I tried to log a TB a few hours ago. No I noticed, that the "retrieved"-logs were placed on the bug's and on my account's page. But the Bug is still listed in the Cache I retrieved it from. And on the other hand it's missing in my inventory. Is it possible, that the server - when completely overloaded - drops single database options here and there? Maybe I log the TB again tomorrow, when it's 4 AM in the US bye, W.B.

In my humle opinion the keyword search as implemened at the moment is nearly useless. When I search for "Lost Place"-Caches for example, I receive about 600 results. Sorted in some strange order, or even not sorted at all. The distance to my home coordinates is also missing. Then I noticed, Pocket Queries don't have an input field for keywords at all! That would be extremely nice, then you could even search around an arbitray center point and have the distances in the result list. Maybe "keyword with distance" could be a "members only"- feature , but I think there *should* be such a feature. Or does anyone really use the keyword search and gets USEFUL results? regards, W.B.