Tobydawgz

Personally, the Labs I've experienced and it's only been a handful have all been very well done and interesting. A comment was made earlier about accessibility hit home and I have to admit that never crossed my mind when thinking about the AL's or LA's whatever you want to call them, it's easy to forget that their are multiple types of cachers and they(the Labs) definitely in my mind do serve a purpose by enhancing their experience. Granted there are areas where Wherigo and Multi's intersect with the Labs but so what? I like them as well. I would like to see Wherigo's refined because the quality can really vary depending on the creator. Can't really speak to Waymarking because I have never done one - not opposed to doing one, it's just never come up. Now that I hear they are like the discontinued locationless caches, I am going to try to find some - along with benchmarks which is something else new that I just heard about. I don't like not being able to see the LA's on my pc because it means I have to use two devices if I am planning at home, something I do on my PC. As a tech consumer professionally, one thing that really does bother mean a lot is when apps/programs/systems are deployed without proper testing or development - there's no quicker way to create negative perception than to do so. Finally, if somebody wants to cheat - so what? They are just losing out on the fun of actually doing the task. There's no prize for anything other than the experience - which is the best prize anyway, that and meeting fellow cachers on the trails and sidewalks.

And then you exclude the Adventure Labs from the search options on the pc based geocaching.com - how the heck does that make sense?

Getting the dreaded "Error 500" message repeatedly on PC - funny because phone is able to access website.