Ahetma Vaakenjaab

That's a rather inane statement, isn't it? How can you defend a thread and complain about not having the $3 a month in a forum you can't get to because you don't have the $3 a month to go there to defend it? Typical Cache 22 conundrum.

I think the maintanence issue is what should have been addressed in the denial from CO Admin if that is the actual issue. By stating that the cacher doesn't log his finds online, CO Admin has implied that was the only reason for not approving the cache. That is not right. I wonder how many other cachers there are that never log their finds? There sure seems to be a lot that never post on these message boards. I think CO Admin should have given 360 an honest denial, not based on whether he logs online or not, as well as giving helpful information as to how to get the cache approved. Probably would have prevented a heated debate here.

I'm glad I'm at zero but with only two posts that's good, right? This is one of the craziest forums I've lurked in ever!

I started with an Etrex Legend this week. I've had it for a couple of months and a friend told me about this site. I have Mapsource Metroguide but don't know if it's good for caching. My friend told me I should get the topo maps. What do you all think?