IDILIO49

Just remember that there are GPSr without support anymore, so if you change anything this means these users are unable to use YOURS functionalities!

Since today (11-06-2014) the GPX files generated (Pocket queries and gpx download from cache page) contained a different tag for type mystery. Used to be: <type>Geocache|Unknown Cache</type> and today is: <type>Geocache|Mystery Cache</type> The immediate result is Garmin GPS doesn't show specific symbol in maps and menus for mystery caches, but a generic geocache symbol instead. When activated a filter in GPS, mystery caches are never displayed as the filter works per positive (only active items displayed) and is not possible to activate mystery caches as they don't exist: http://www.garmindeveloper.com/apps/GarminCustomSymbols/CustomGeocacheList.txt

The problem being discussed here is that some users are unable to click on caches on the maps. Here are 6 other discussions relating to this exact problem, some of them going back as far as April and May: Non interactive map with Google Chrome Geocache Map - Not possible to select caches - MAC only Hovering over geocaching bubble Map Bubbles don't display map details Trouble with the Map As you can see, the problem of not being able to click on caches is not new. If the problem you started experiencing several days ago is different than this, feel free to start another topic and describe the problem. Since you posted in a topic discussing the "can't click on caches on the map" problem, I naturally assumed you are seeing the same problem. Is this not the problem you're having? That's a good example of what I said earlier, in that the problem is inconsistent. In your linked post, you mentioned that it worked fine for you in Firefox. I only use Firefox, and I see this problem frequently. When different users using the same browser report different results, it makes it difficult to pinpoint the problem. Maybe you didn't noticed but GS is merging topics with "similar" issues, but not exactly the same. Is good for the mess...

If it was a simple correction, they would have made that correction 6 months ago when this problem was first reported. It may have only started for you a few days ago, but it started for many others back in the spring when this version of the map was first released. And I think you may have hit the nail on the head. It is not a simple fix so it can not be addressed in the two week cycle. It seems that the fixes that may take more than the two week sprint cycle are ignored and they look for something else to do. I guess that is what prioritizing means. Not quite what I meant... Based on the reports that have been posted in the forums, this is a very intermittent and inconsistent problem, with no known method to reliably reproduce it. That makes it extremely difficult to troubleshoot and find a fix. Just in my experience with this problem, it will come and go with no apparent pattern, even when using the same browser, same map layer, same location, etc. Just be patient. I'm sure they'll find the problem eventually. Is it so hard to you to understand that the problem since some days ago is a different problem? If you don't help, please don't difficult...

Today is already October 1 and the problem still persists... No news? If you look at the date of Nate's post, you'll see that only 3 days have passed, 2 of which were the weekend. Anyway, this issue has been present for many months now with no fix. What's another few days? If you are happy this is your problem. 3 day is too many time for a customer that is paying for a service that is not available. And apparently has a simple correction. For me it only started a few days ago, not so many time...

Today is already October 1 and the problem still persists... No news?

If the first time you select images you select only one image (then you can go back and select all you want) the next times you press "Add Images" you go directly to the folder where it was that image. This is a Windows bug!

So I hope you can present me another application to upload photos in batch to my logs...

Mais dois para a lista: #23 29-12-2010 19:40 GC2K95Y Descobrir Setúbal I #24 02-01-2011 19:12 GC2J4PZ [363] Igreja Matriz de S. Pedro em Palmela

22 FTF's para a lista: #1 15-07-2009 17:15 GC1VYRQ Largo Joaquim Santos Boga [seixal] #2 28-09-2009 16:05 GC1Z2H7 o primeiro bispo #3 04-10-2009 16:30 GC1Z4KZ Pequenos recantos (Setúbal) #4 27-10-2009 20:00 GC207JQ A outra margem [Arcos de Valdevez] #5 16-11-2009 10:40 GC20P7X Marco #1 #6 17-11-2009 14:18 GC213DX Voltar a ser criança #7 23-11-2009 12:00 GC21A1X Fogo & Historia #8 04-12-2009 8:54 GC21BQ8 sailor's talk [parque da paz #5] #9 19-01-2010 17:20 GC22735 Ah montes! de anos.. [Miranda do Corvo] #10 26-01-2010 18:05 GC23ACW Aerogerador #11 28-01-2010 20:00 GC23DJ2 Eira Comunitária de Porreiras #12 12-03-2010 13:35 GC20D8Z Biblioteca Municipal do Barreiro #13 01-04-2010 12:15 GC1KZAK Montes de Tempo #14 14-04-2010 19:17 GC26DTB O Nome da Rosa #15 04-05-2010 18:17 GC27TBE A1 A/S Santarém S/N #16 27-05-2010 19:37 GC291RT Monte de Sao Mamede #17 18-06-2010 13:00 GC2ACNH Trilho dos Fetos #18 21-07-2010 20:38 GC2AGYE A placa #19 20-09-2010 13:00 GC2F9FK Bico da Areia #20 19-10-2010 21:30 GC2FJ4W The Age of Invention #21 25-10-2010 17:45 GC2H7Q1 MONTE TRIANOS #22 11-12-2010 15:55 GC2JFMC Pelourinho de Setúbal

IDILIO, tens que voltar a ler isso. E isto: É uma situação única, como te temos estado a tentar explicar. Ok, ok acho que já percebi! É uma situação única.... ....que contraria as regras....

7 miseros FTF para a lista: GC1VYRQ Largo Joaquim Santos Boga [seixal] GC1Z2H7 o primeiro bispo GC1Z4KZ Pequenos recantos (Setúbal) GC207JQ A outra margem [Arcos de Valdevez] GC20P7X Marco #1 GC213DX Voltar a ser criança GC21A1X Fogo & Historia

Eu é que subverti as regras?? Não fiz nada contra as regras! E tal como a frase começa "as coordenadas publicadas da cache são falsas" e isso sim é que está a subverter as regras... Gostava de ver as regras que dizem o contrário... Quanto a haver outras, pois há, mas irrita-me as injustiças e o não cumprimento das regras, portanto luto por elas... Eu sei que nem sempre concordamos com as regras, mas isso não nos da o direito de as alterar à nossa maneira...

Eu sei disso tudo! O problema é que isso é como devia ser, e não como é! Dá uma vista de olhos à listing... a cahe não está onde as dicas indicam ( e as dicas não servem pura e simplesmente para nada) Eu já tenho as dicas todas e....

Ok. Até ai tudo bem, mas e se estivermos a falar de uma simples Multi-Cache, ou até mesmo uma Tradicional? Uma Multi ou uma Tradicional não te podem obrigar a logar nenhuma outra. Apenas uma Challenge (Mistério). Uma Multi pode obrigar-te a ir dentro do recipiente de outra cache (seja ela qual for) ver um dado (um número, um código), mas registar a visita não. Pois isso era o que eu pensava antes de tentar fazer a GCG7E7. Consegui todas as dicas necessárias (e que trabalheira deu), e agora o owner recusa-se a enviar as coordenadas porque não tenho registada a visita na GCG768. Se a cache tivesse onde devia (ou seja onde as dicas nos levam) já a tinha encontrado, agora assim... Parece que neste País as regras ainda só continuam a servir para ser quebradas...

Ok. Até ai tudo bem, mas e se estivermos a falar de uma simples Multi-Cache, ou até mesmo uma Tradicional?

Gostaria de esclarecer uma dúvida, Até que ponto pode ser requisito obrigatório para fazer o Found de uma cache, ter préviamente o Found de outra cache? (Mesmo que a outra cache tenha informações essenciais para encontrar a primeira, essas informações podem ser sempre partilhadas)

just testing