Folks,
I, and what others are becoming tired of, is searching for a Micro that was hidden by a GPS owner that has no idea what error margin is. Unfortunatley there are GPS owners that have a 101 knowledge in the Geocache world but have no idea how location firm/software works. Circular Error Probable (CEP) is a formula used to do what we enjoy when we Geocache. It is so simple with pencil and paper it is scary and not necessary to discuss because the device does it for us. However, when someone hides something (Micro) the size of a Peanut M&M in a forest or bushy area, and they do not understand Error Margin of the GPS they are using, they elude people that they have hidden a cache that is worthy of search. I see an ever increasing number of people that are swearing off Micros beacause of this, "The hider was incompetent." The search for these Cache's when the area is narrowed to 3 meters is difficult naturally, and draws appreciation toward "craft of hide when found;" but when that 3 meter circle cant be determined or relied upon it brings doubt within our ranks. Yes, a Micro hider (Nano Size) can get a hide approved without knowing how to use a GPS, create error margins that make it impossible to find, snicker for their work, and continue to deter people to find them or bring respect to Micro existance. My suggestion to the validators, Groundspeak, and whoever writes the rules on "Hiding a Cache" is this: When Micros are hidden, you must publish the Error Margin information on your GPS when placing it. If the Error Margin is greater than 5 meters the following must be done for the Hide to be published: Wait until conditions improve to gain less than 5 meter Error Margin, Find a different location, Utilize a device that is capable of gaining less than 5 meters of Error Margin. Why? Because my 5 meters of error added to the Hiders 5 meters makes a 10 meter circle (30+feet) to find something the size of a Peanut M&M.
The whole idea is to find it, not to make it unfound...
RTExplorer