[Thoughts On Cachers That Don't Post Finds?]

Yes, I have found that my cache is found 2:1 relative to the number of times the on-line log is signed. I was curious about this as well.

[Add Ranking Feature To Site]

Well, it sounds like most are against the ranking. But jeeeze, I think you all are taking the ranking a little

to serious. Have some fun with it, don't over analyze it. Yikes, I'll just keep caching. Hey I found one

worth three points yesterday. ;-)

[Add Ranking Feature To Site]

While I was hunting a very difficult cache, I was thinking about a Cacher Ranking system. Instead of soley listing how many caches you found you, it would be neat to rank you amongst all cachers in the world. So

for instance, let's say you find a cache with a difficulty of 5 and terrain of 5, that would be worth ten points,

or maybe you find a difficulty of 3 and terrain of 1, that would be worth 4 points. You could also add

a points for caches, multicaches, benchmarks etc. For instance, a multi-cache might be worth 2 points

times the difficulty and terrain so 2+3+1=6. As a result, then you could keep the total points for each

cachers and provide ranking relative to all cachers. This might provide everyone with more incentive to

place and find harder caches and try to be the best in the country. Does, seem like it would be too hard

to implement, just a little compute power behind the scenes.