Jump to content

Kunjamuk

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kunjamuk

  1. Yes, I have found that my cache is found 2:1 relative to the number of times the on-line log is signed. I was curious about this as well.
  2. Well, it sounds like most are against the ranking. But jeeeze, I think you all are taking the ranking a little to serious. Have some fun with it, don't over analyze it. Yikes, I'll just keep caching. Hey I found one worth three points yesterday. ;-)
  3. While I was hunting a very difficult cache, I was thinking about a Cacher Ranking system. Instead of soley listing how many caches you found you, it would be neat to rank you amongst all cachers in the world. So for instance, let's say you find a cache with a difficulty of 5 and terrain of 5, that would be worth ten points, or maybe you find a difficulty of 3 and terrain of 1, that would be worth 4 points. You could also add a points for caches, multicaches, benchmarks etc. For instance, a multi-cache might be worth 2 points times the difficulty and terrain so 2+3+1=6. As a result, then you could keep the total points for each cachers and provide ranking relative to all cachers. This might provide everyone with more incentive to place and find harder caches and try to be the best in the country. Does, seem like it would be too hard to implement, just a little compute power behind the scenes.
×
×
  • Create New...