elyob

I often find issue with those last login dates on the group data page. It is more accurate to check the user's profile to see when they were last on Groundspeak.

Teehee, it's working now and you've got 90 to go.

Try any username aside from my own and I get this message. Username: You selected a username that does not exist in the Waymarking database.

"Examples: ...Apollo 15 Service Module - National Space Centre - London, UK..." Service modules burned up during reentry to earth's atmosphere. National Space Centre is in Belgrave, Leicester.

When the astronaut finished walking on the moon he entered the Lunar Module where moon dust would have settled. The Lunar Module did not return to earth. It was released to crash into the moon or the sun. If we accept the Command Module as a likely place for lunar dust, we should also accept any equipment from inside the crew spaces of the Command Module, equipment which might now be displayed separate from the Command Module itself. Soviet craft Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24 also returned to earth with lunar samples.

Will pieces of equipment etc that were in the command module (exposed to the astronauts) be accepted?

Concerning wording, I am sending many comments directly.

...and yet we keep playing this game, despite all the tricks we need to use.

Playing BINGO gets even more challenging.

The new FOE category was also placed strangely in the grid.

WMQD??

When is the last time a category got 100% of the vote?

Congratulations!

I understand your arguments for separate Waymarking categories. However, I don't think you understand the potential to have one Waymarking category that will include all historic sites or objects, regardless of which level of government assigns the historic status. Perhaps that sentence needs to be properly translated to Dutch.

Can the Dutch national monuments category be expanded to be Dutch heritage sites recognized at the national, provincial and municipal levels?

The English language spelling is Provincial.

It looks very good. A somewhat ordinary looking pergola would be considered if the site is historical, correct?

That challenge may put quite a burden on the reviewers. I can imagine poor examples slipping through and then being rejected long after being accepted.

But in this case, restaurants in Scotland would be accepted.

Good job for still voting Yea even if halfheartedly.

Thank you for that reply. As a professional, family history researcher who spends too much time in cemeteries, I suspect that the number of monuments with any stated cause of death is much less than 5%. Thanks again.

When the monument states that the deceased died (or was killed) during or because of war, then the grave should now qualify for this category, correct?

Pacheco4967

Merry Christmas and congratulations on your first waymark.

Interestingly, indoor/outdoor waymark was just published.