elyob

The posted URL did not work for me but I was able to review the categories description elsewhere. One of the variables is Rate this Restaurant. I was not around for the beginning of Waymarking. I have never understood this variable. Rate this Restaurant: do we still need to include this variable? As a waymark visitor, too often I have encountered this variable left incomplete by the waymark creator.

I have map problems still but they seem so insignificant now.

I can't believe that Chi-Chis is still out there, if far away. Any other chains that I can think of will be limited to USA and Canada: Taco del Mar, Mucho Burrito, Burrito Boyz, etc.

Out of respect for the family members, how recent is too recent for including information about the deceased in a waymark? This is not a new topic but I have been unable to find the earlier discussion. Perhaps the suggested delay to waymark the deceased is actually written in a category description. Perhaps it was suggested on this forum. Perhaps I read the suggestions presented in voting for a new category proposal. Thanks in advance.

Taco Time more than 300 franchises in the United States, Canada, Kuwait, and Curaçao/Netherlands Antilles

Moe's Southwest Grill

The whole Waymarking.com site stuff has me so unmotivated, I did not take a single photograph.

I am on a road trip but there is no way for me to know if there are any waymarks to visit. I guess I just have to photograph everything, then visit or post waymarks in 2016.

Waymarking.com would not open on browser but I did get through to review a waymark by clicking link on e-mail notice for the new waymark.

That is my error message on the Waymarking welcome page.

Compilation Error Description: An error occurred during the compilation of a resource required to service this request. Please review the following specific error details and modify your source code appropriately. Compiler Error Message: BC30560: 'controls_homepagepushcontrol_ascx' is ambiguous in the namespace 'ASP'. Source Error: Line 18: <uc1:HomePageDisplay ID="HomePageDisplay1" runat="server"></uc1:HomePageDisplay> Line 19: <uc1:NewSearchControl ID="NewSearchControl1" runat="server"></uc1:NewSearchControl> Line 20: <uc1:HomePagePushControl ID="HomePagePushControl1" runat="server"></uc1:HomePagePushControl> Line 21: <uc1:BlogControl ID="BlogControl1" runat="server"></uc1:BlogControl> Line 22: <uc1:WaymarkControl ID="WaymarkControl1" runat="server"></uc1:WaymarkControl> Source File: E:\inetpub\www.Waymarking.com\Waymarking.Web.release-20150622.1.Release_13\default.aspx Line: 20

Awesome!

I get the same error attempting to upload image or choose province on new waymark.

Did you get your three officers?

With IE9.0.8 I am still unable to sign in to Waymarking.com.

Is this the end of Waymarking?

Waymarking.com is still not working in Ottawa, Canada.

I still cannot log in.

That is a great idea.

I am not happy with lack of sat view in geocaching or Waymarking maps.

It looks like we now have the new geocaching.com maps.

While I have no expectation that the category would pass, you can also contact me if you need someone for a group for a K-mart category.

Congratulations on the new Waymarking category!

If you still require assitance with the revolution, I could be an officer.

When my waymark is rejected, I edit the Waymarking category and begin again, creating a completely different waymark.