Well I think that you are also missguided. Although you should not have to avoid LEO when caching, it is realy your job to not draw muggle attention to a cache. If you don't think you can, then don't look for it. But, I will aggree that your technique is often the best for not attrachting attention. And your statments about the cops are totaly correct, don't want to appear sneaky.
Statments like "It is the COs problem" make you sound like an ignorant jerk.
You can call me any name you like, however, there is an implicit relationship between hider and finder. My responsibility as a finder is to return the cache as I found it, and report any problems with the cache (log wet, cache broken, etc). My responsibility as a hider is to ensure that the place I've selected for the hide is environmentally sensitive, has the permission of the land owner, and is likely to remain in place on a long-term basis. The onus is on the hider to hide in an appropriate location. If I need to use a cloak-and-dagger routine to keep the cache from being muggled, it's A BAD HIDE. I will not use stealth, period, ever, and if my lack of stealth causes a cache to go missing, it should be an indication to the cache owner that THIS IS NOT A GOOD SPOT FOR A HIDE.
IMO, Geocaching is a totally legit and family friendly activity, and encouraging people to be stealthy undermines the sport by setting people up to act in a way that may lead to a negative interaction with law enforcement or the public, who are likely to get the understanding that caching is fundamentally based in trespassing. My not being stealthy SPECIFICALLY helps to weed out those caches that have no business being there in the first place. Not to mention, looking like you belong there is usually better cover than trying to apply stealth!
This. He said it in a much more intelligent fashion than I, however.