BlessedBees
-
Posts
123 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by BlessedBees
-
-
-
-
...and so it should be obvious that you shouldn't use the same password here as anywhere else. Don't let a password compromised from this site leave you vulnerable elsewhere. Practice safe computing!
-
Were you logged-in as a PM at the time?
-
A checkbox type setup would be nice but i have a feeling that we probably won't see anything like that implemented.
This check box would be nice to have. My 'feeling' is the same as yours - doubtful.
-
If it is placed properly (with permission of the land manager) then it couldn't possibly be considered litter. In that regard it isn't any different than a sculpture or other object placed on their grounds. And, since you should be removing it when it is archived....
There wouldn't be anyone to ever press charges because they approved its placement.
Now if you are placing it without permission... that is a different story and I would say you are actually littering.
-
I also used mobi because it was included with my downloads and was simple. Now that my premium membership is over in a couple weeks, is there any reason to renew?
Don't worry - check out this page.... http://www.geocaching.com/waypoints/ It says the Mobi files are still being supported.
-
Unless you know the GC code
I would send the GC code, but the paper I wrote it on disappeared too....
-
Some may be concerned about number (let them - it doesn't matter). But it also about accounting for each of the ones I found separate from the ones someone else in my team found. Being able to log as a group (selecting who was present) would keep the logs clean - without having a log for me and one "I was caching with him" and another "I was caching with him too". Each team member could still run a PQ that would only eliminate th ones THEY found or the ones the team found when they were present.
I am with you 100% CR.(500 word smart aleck-y post deleted in favor of the following.)This thread gives rise to yet another reason I'd like to hide my find count and the option to remove the ability of our caches to increment a finder's count.
Complaining about logging via a team account versus an individual account is flat out ridiculous IMHO. It's obvious that some folks take the whole chase for numbers just a bit too far.
-
-
What's the catch? There must be an expiration.
-
seems like every other topic is about maps. Can we get these consolidated?
-
seems like every other topic is about maps. Can we get these consolidated?
-
seems like every other topic is about maps. Can we get these consolidated?
-
seems like every other topic is about maps. Can we get these consolidated?
-
for me it isn't 'competition' just that the wife would like to keep better track of hers versus ours versus mine.
-
...and there are some that will choose not to use the function.
-
... and you would check off which members were present when the cache was found....
PERFECT!
-
seems like every other topic is about maps. Can we get these consolidated?
-
I would like to see a team addition - so that I can track my personal finds - BOTH when I am out myself AND when I am with the family. Seems like the should be a way to form a team and then when the team logs the find then I personally get the find also. I just don't see a point in polluting the logs with a 'team' (family) find and then duplicating one for myself.
The team (family) doesn't really want to count my finds when I am on business travel.
A team / group function would makes this really slick!
-
@Groundspeak: Come on, would it really be that hard for you to update the page http://www.geocaching.com/waypoints/ so that it no longer reads: "eBook - As a Premium Member you can also choose to have a list of waypoints compiled into MobiPocket eBook format."
Hard to believe we are almost 3 months since this service was discontinued and the page STILL lists that as a PM benefit. Not like it requires a difficult change - just delete that HTML line....
-
??
e-mailing the link doesn't solve the problem of having too many. And saving the data doesn't serve any purpose since it will change over time. I believe it is the query parameters that were being discussed. -
Oops double post... sorry
-
NEW FLASH : Don't put SWAG in your mouth!!!
Finding Bookmark Lists
in General geocaching topics
Posted
And I thought I was alone in thinking that would be useful.