Jump to content

BlessedBees

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    123
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BlessedBees

  1. And I thought I was alone in thinking that would be useful.
  2. http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=177177
  3. ...and so it should be obvious that you shouldn't use the same password here as anywhere else. Don't let a password compromised from this site leave you vulnerable elsewhere. Practice safe computing!
  4. Were you logged-in as a PM at the time?
  5. This check box would be nice to have. My 'feeling' is the same as yours - doubtful.
  6. If it is placed properly (with permission of the land manager) then it couldn't possibly be considered litter. In that regard it isn't any different than a sculpture or other object placed on their grounds. And, since you should be removing it when it is archived.... There wouldn't be anyone to ever press charges because they approved its placement. Now if you are placing it without permission... that is a different story and I would say you are actually littering.
  7. Don't worry - check out this page.... http://www.geocaching.com/waypoints/ It says the Mobi files are still being supported.
  8. I would send the GC code, but the paper I wrote it on disappeared too....
  9. I am with you 100% CR. Some may be concerned about number (let them - it doesn't matter). But it also about accounting for each of the ones I found separate from the ones someone else in my team found. Being able to log as a group (selecting who was present) would keep the logs clean - without having a log for me and one "I was caching with him" and another "I was caching with him too". Each team member could still run a PQ that would only eliminate th ones THEY found or the ones the team found when they were present.
  10. What's the catch? There must be an expiration.
  11. seems like every other topic is about maps. Can we get these consolidated?
  12. seems like every other topic is about maps. Can we get these consolidated?
  13. seems like every other topic is about maps. Can we get these consolidated?
  14. seems like every other topic is about maps. Can we get these consolidated?
  15. for me it isn't 'competition' just that the wife would like to keep better track of hers versus ours versus mine.
  16. ...and there are some that will choose not to use the function.
  17. seems like every other topic is about maps. Can we get these consolidated?
  18. I would like to see a team addition - so that I can track my personal finds - BOTH when I am out myself AND when I am with the family. Seems like the should be a way to form a team and then when the team logs the find then I personally get the find also. I just don't see a point in polluting the logs with a 'team' (family) find and then duplicating one for myself. The team (family) doesn't really want to count my finds when I am on business travel. A team / group function would makes this really slick!
  19. Hard to believe we are almost 3 months since this service was discontinued and the page STILL lists that as a PM benefit. Not like it requires a difficult change - just delete that HTML line....
  20. ?? e-mailing the link doesn't solve the problem of having too many. And saving the data doesn't serve any purpose since it will change over time. I believe it is the query parameters that were being discussed.
×
×
  • Create New...