Jump to content

Cornix

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    336
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Cornix

  1. If you have to transfer the Dash for Cache locationless cache to Waymarking.com, I think I have a solution for it.

     

    1) You manage your category of something like "changing locations". (Im sure you can be more creative than I am in naming it.) Getting it accepted shouldnt be hard with the 225 plus members watching that cache currently.

     

    2) You alone manage all listings in that category. Each listing would then be your current targets. When you retire a target, you archive the listing.

    I think this is a bad idea. If something is worth Waymarking it shouldn't be archived if it still exists.

     

    The "Dash for Cache" locationless had some interesting tasks. But I don't like the time restriction, it's unnecessary.

     

    Cornix

  2. Your cache as such will not be converted, except maybe for the cache description.

     

    What you get is a new empty category ('airports') to manage. Former loggers of your AV8R cache will be informed so they can re-create their finds as waymarks if they want.

     

    No data from geocaching.com will be migrated over to Waymarking.com. Any new waymark category will start fresh. However, we will do our best to inform previous locationless cache loggers so they can apply their log to the new Waymarking site.

     

    Cornix

  3. I just saw some waymark descriptions in French. I have no problems with that, but as this a new site and a worldwide activity it would be great to have more (optional) input fields for descriptions in local languages other than English.

     

    For example:

    - Short Description (English):

    - Long Description (English):

     

    - Local Language 1: (dropdown box)

    - Short Description (Local Language 1):

    - Long Description (Local Language 1):

     

    - Local Language 2: (dropdown box)

    - Short Description (Local Language 2):

    - Long Description (Local Language 2):

     

    This would make it possible to filter for waypoint descriptions in languages you can read.

     

    Cornix

  4. How is this a replacement for virts?

     

    I just don't get it.

    It's a 4 level concept:

     

    - main categories

    - subcategories (= locationless caches)

    - waymarks (= virtual caches)

    - logs

     

    The manager of a subcategory (for example 'Lighthouses') is responsible for approving new waymarks ('The old Lighthouse at Land's End') in their domain. The owner of a waymark can control the logs of visitors to that waymark. So I guess it's up to them to ask for some kind of proof.

     

    Cornix

  5. Let's say I create a category of Goldmines.

    Then anybody can add a new goldmine or log the already existing goldmine under this category.

    Did I get this correctly?

    I guess that's right. But by adding a new goldmine (waymark) you are in fact creating a new 'virtual cache' that you are responsible for. You have to deal with the category owner who must 'approve' your waymark and you have to check the logs of the visitors if they met the requirements. :)

     

    That sounds like a lot of work for such a simple task.

     

    Cornix

  6. The big question is: what happens to the locationless logs?

     

    As I unterstand it a locationless cache is equivalent to a category. But a category can't be logged directly. You have to create a waymark (= virtual cache) inside that category first so others can log that waymark.

     

    But what if I'm not interested in creating and maintaining a waymark but only in logging a find (of a not yet existing) waymark? :rolleyes:

     

    Cornix

  7. Just wondering why there is no DNF log type on a locationless? There have been several times when I've been really close to finding a locationless, but for whatever reason, didn't quite manage to meet the criteria ...

    You mean something like this? :)

     

    Cornix

  8. This topic was brought up in the German speaking forum:

     

    Is it possible to add more 'stop words' to the smart name algorithm, for example the German or French articles (der/die/das, le/la/les)? On the other hand 'die' could be omitted in German but perhaps not in English. :rolleyes:

     

    So a better solution would be to have a user editable stop word list.

     

    Cornix

  9. I definitely saw something about some cards not being supported.  I wish I could find the document!

    It's mentioned in the old Magellan Meridian FAQ by Robert Lipe:

     

    Currently, cards are available from many sources with capacities ranging from 8MB to 512MB. All cards 256MB and under are known to work extremely well, and Magellan has stated that 512MB cards are now supported. Magellan sells SD cards, but their cards are approximately twice as expensive as other brands, and offer no performance advantage. Avoid them unless you can get them at a significant discount.

     

    Problems have been reported with SanDisk cards of 256-512 MB. Certain of these cards do not work in the Meridian, although they work with other devices. Magellan is reported to be working on a fix (which may be included in the firmware v4.51 or later).

     

    Source: Magellan Meridian FAQ, Version 2.0 – 10/31/2003

     

    Cornix

  10. I used a 66X Sandisk Ultra II card and compared it against a regular card.

    Honestly, there isn't much speed difference between the two. The 66X was a little faster, but not fast enough to warrant spending too much money on it.

    There is no difference in the reading speed between regular and fast Sandisk cards (8.5 MB/sec). However the Ultra II cards are about 4 times faster in writing data (5.7 MB/sec vs 1.5 MB/sec).

     

    The writing speed pays off in digicams which can shoot faster with such a card.

     

    Cornix

  11. I just looked at the source code of a random cache page. There's a form tag and an input tag before the html tag:

     

    <form name="Form1" method="post" action="cache_details.aspx?guid=..." id="Form1">
    <input type="hidden" name="__VIEWSTATE" value="..." />
    
    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
    <html>
    <HEAD>
    

     

    Is this allowed under stricter rules? ;)

     

    Cornix

×
×
  • Create New...