I was the one who logged this cache and had it deleted. Nothing in my log was offensive or a lie or personal. I wrote my log to try and deter people with kids and dogs from going to a potentially hazardous location. I received a long message from one CO that basically accused me of being abusive. I was blunt but in no way abusive. Several of this series had us walking in places with no footpaths not I highly doubt permission.
My log was then deleted. I logged it again and then received more messages from the other CO calling me abusive again. I then suggested they look up the word abusive. My next message had the dictionary definition of abusive with their interpretation of how I had been "habitually cruel".
A lot of their caches are difficult to log, I have always been respectful in my logs and not said too much about the rubbish nearby or strange locations. This one, however, is different! I have done many caches that are higher terrain, with my 8 year old, and I would take him back to most of them. This is a 1.5/1.5, with a "recommended for kids" attribute. It is behind a locked gate which can also be approached via a field with no public footpaths. It has big mounds of woodchips and manure. Disgusting rank water of unknown depths. Rubbish, broken glass. And I'm pretty sure no public access. I was very tempted to log an NA straight away but felt that harsh for a new cache.
So in trying to let people with kids and dogs know what this location is like I've had my log deleted and been accused of being abusive. Something which I am not. Ground speak don't like my tone, believe me, I was being restrained. It is foul and hazardous and not a place I ever want to have to visit again.