Jump to content

Roman_Jaromer

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Roman_Jaromer

  1. When I look at it in great detail, so for me: + The new look does not come bad, I can get used to it (to put some more +) + TB / GC - in the old one you have to click on each and select from the list; for the new one you just have to expand the list and then just click it is probably faster. + Adding photos + Blocking double FI logs - Photo can be add only without a description - I can Add only one photo (another I must add by old system) - No formatting - There is no preview of log with formatting, but it is unnecessary without formatting. While formatting is working, it's a question of whether this is the forerunner of a complete cancellation of log formatting. - For old logging, it was much better to see links to the author and the name of the cache (+ clearly see the type of cache). Now I don't see, there are links! - There is no option to encrypt the log - Editing the log goes into the old look (even with the formatting of the logs - quite odd) - THE BIGGEST problem I see for myself as the owner of several caches to change the concept of NM and NA logs linked to FI logos, as I have already written here. The NM and the NA log itself do not solve anything, everything is in the "original" FI log, where the original writer does not even have to say anything about it because he thinks he just wrote the NM flag. And then there are problems with monitoring NM and NA logs that can not be written separately, etc. If I have watchlist only on NM or NA logs, now I must go to the web and find FI / WN log, which may be with another date. It's lost of time for me and bigger server load. More in the topic: http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=344094&st=50 - New system is SLOWER + - It has not changed: The option to add to favorites was already in the original logging - so here improvements in graphics only. Excuse me for my bad English.
  2. If this reads one of the developers, return the original NM logging option and don't change this system, please. Or at least ask for an explanation of NM logos separately. Why? I'm Owner - If it comes NM log to email with log "This geocacher reported that there is a problem with this cache." I must go to web and find what happened. Previously I know it from log NM. I'm Cacher - If I visited more caches I log it for long time (from PC) (I don't write only TFTC from mobil in terrain). That if I wait with NM log to my FI log - log NM can come for many days since my visit. But the NM log itself I wrote earlier, with old system... In new system it is not possible. If you would like do it better, you may leave link to NM / NA log in logging page, but please in second step - Let people fill the NM/NA log. And leave possibility post NM/NA log separately. This is my point of view. Thanks. Sorry for my bad English
  3. I agree with Pontiac_CZ and other. I have a solution that will work for some people. http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=336887 I do not understand why I have to use complicated procedures, that in a few months will not work, because the GS again changes the structure of email. I would like to undo the sending of logs without HTML, as it once did. E-mails were small, clear. If someone wants graphics logs, let us the choice whether we want it or not! Simply option on notification if we would like log as plain text or in HTML. Is this so much ???
  4. I do not understand, why you don't improve existing messaging with new features used in the new center. The new system has the additional benefit: - Autocompletion Nick, whom I want to write - Sending pictures - Autocomplete links to TB, GC or geokeše - Backup of messages sent and received, if sent to the GS. But you can upgrade existing systems without any problems with these things and for many people the process will be far more beneficial than new "message center". Do not take our ability to use email to normal communicate! I do not want for each message lengthy to log in to the geocaching.com to use system like "facebook"! For user only applications surely goes in the email link to answer them in their account at geocaching.com!
  5. 1) I would like copy message to my mail from this message center which I send, as the old messaging system. Can I do it? If not, why? 2) Why isn't text of message in notifications mail? I have to go to new message center to know whether the message is important. May you send message with notification mail as old system? If not, why? 3) I would like send answer to message from another geocacher directly through email as old messaging system, when he didn't check "do not send email". When I have to go from email to www.geocaching.com - it is for me complicated. And for server geocaching.com it's higher load (when for answer we have to go to server), when now (in last week) it goes so slowly... 4) I would like send notifications of all answers, not only about some messages (after half hour) 5) I send message to anybody - then I turn out message centrum. When somewhere aswer to me, before half hour - then email don't come to me, and icon in the corner on geocaching.com does not indicate that the message came from. It's bad, because I don't know, than somebody answers me. How long will be messages on server? And how can we find something between messages? Will be some finding tools? When I will after year look for something... Between my mail I can find by text long time ago... If I have the option to send me a message (and copy of my sent messages) to my mail and I will be able to answer the mail, it will be great. But else I please to choice to blocked to send me messages from this message centrum. I want to have all message from GC on one place (in my mail).
  6. 1) I would like copy message to my mail from this message center which I send, as the old messaging system. Can I do it? If not, why? 2) Why isn't text of message in notifications mail? I have to go to new message center to know whether the message is important. May you send message with notification mail as old system? If not, why? 3) I would like send answer to message from another geocacher directly through email as old messaging system, when he didn't check "do not send email". When I have to go from email to www.geocaching.com - it is for me complicated. And for server geocaching.com it's higher load (when for answer we have to go to server), when now (in last week) it goes so slowly... 4) I would like send notifications of all answers, not only about some messages. How long will be messages on server? And how can we find between messages? Will be some finding tools? When I will after year look for something... Between my mail I can find by text long time ago...
  7. What benefits? What horrors we have to wait? I am curious where that greater percentage of feedback comes from. I see min. 90% people is dissatisfied with this changes. On our region forum is similar! Where you have peoples, who are satisfied? Where are your feedback??? Our opinions does not matter to you. Very well elaborated. This change may be good, if this mail was without HTML - only plain text!!!
  8. +1 Totally agree. New mails are horrible. It is hard to read and you have to redo the filters in emails. Please immediately reverse the changes. Most of the changes here is the worse! Old mail has about 2,5 kB. New mail has about 15 kB big!!! It's terrible!
  9. I didn't like this new changes. Possible variant from "thebruce0" is better, but old icons is the best. Why don't you prefer to correct errors and does not improve the promotion of languages ​​and other subjects to improve ...
×
×
  • Create New...