We might have missed this on another post, but we have found some inconsistencies in how caches are rated for terrain and difficulty.
I went on a cache hunt today with my wife and kids (ages 5,3,1). It was rated a 1 for both difficulty and terrain. This cache was well over a half mile one way up and down hills on rocky and sandy soil. The path was occasionally lined with cactus with the cache location being on the side of a small hill. My kids were ok for most of the hike to the cache, but worn out for the return. There were 5 other caches in the general area, but each one required a similar hike. They were all rated 1/1 with one of them being 1/1.5...This might have been okay for me and my wife with hiking boots on, but seeing a rating of 1, we wore sneakers.
I think we need a set of guidelines for determining the difficulty/terrain ratings. My proposed list for terrain is:
1 - Suitable for any age (young kids and those over 80)
2 - Ok for children at least 5 or 6 years old and seniors in good shape.
3 - Teenagers and up to retirement age
4 - Physically fit adults
5 - Adults that are prepared for a challenge
These are only rough guidelines, discretion should still be used on each cache.
Difficulty ratings should be similar, but they don't have to match exactly.
Obviously, children would need to be accompanied by an adult as most caches are in an area you must drive to get to the trailhead. The actual hike should follow the rating guidelines.
Drive-up caches (within a hundred feet or so of the parking area) would probably be a 1 unless a 4-wheel-drive is needed.
What do you think?
FriarED
Team GPSaxophone
P.S. Found the rating system after making this post. I tried rating the cache using the form and it came back with 1/3. How about making that rating form more prominent on the placing a cache page?
[This message was edited by Team GPSaxophone on May 01, 2002 at 05:24 PM.]