Jump to content

CamoCacher

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    223
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CamoCacher

  1. Yes these are beautiful coins. Both in look and feel. You won't be disappointed. How much is international shipping? 1.50 for the first coin .50 after
  2. Invoice went out today - paypal was down last night for upgrading
  3. Have you down - send me an email addy to invoice you at
  4. Have you down - need an email addy to invoice too
  5. Paypal email to invoice at? Have you down
  6. Have you down - where do I email you the invoice via paypal
  7. What is the paypal address to invoice you at - you are down
  8. Dardevle Let me know what kind and quantity on here or the MNGCA and I'll get you on the list - let me know where to invoice you at too! Thanks for the words of support.
  9. Have you down - let me know where to send the payal invoice too!
  10. The MN 2008 MNGCA Coins have arrived and are ready for sale. This is a first come - first served sale. We have antique and shiny silver coins. Please specify the type and number of each in your post. They are 10.00 each plus 1.50 for the first coin (for shipping) and 0.50 for each coin thereafter. They are trackable and have their own unique icon.
  11. your okay - I know we got quite a few in the flood areas LAGRAC you out there and still dry?
  12. Ramsey Rally http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_detai...&Submit6=Go June 9, 2007 at Alexander Ramsey Park in Redwood Falls Minnesota Camping is $19 and there are 31 sites. The park does not accept 'reservations' for the campsites, but the park supervisor has agreed to let the committee pre-pay for the sites we want when we arrive on Friday to finish setting up. So, if anyone knows they are going to camp, you need to let me know no later than June 1st.
  13. The only problem I see with the search first is that over time things change and sometimes drastically. If they search and go off that info it might not be relevant or even right anymore. Then they walk away thinking they have current and right info when in fact they do not.
  14. oHHH!!! May I please have three softly scrambled egges, with really really realy crisp bacon? Please? MMMMM Crispy Bacon MMMMMM I wish I had some. But I'll get started on those eggs.... Thank you! When will you be knocking on the door?
  15. You get eggs and white toast and hot coco.....how would you like your eggs cooked? Sounds great, but please tell me that there is no chance I'm being set up for a "liar's dinner". You promise eggs and toast and cocoa, but if it turns out we're actually having eggplant and Ovaltine, you do realize that I won't be happy, right? You can have eggs, white toast and coco but you got drive all the way to my house.
  16. You get eggs and white toast and hot coco.....how would you like your eggs cooked? oHHH!!! May I please have three softly scrambled egges, with really really realy crisp bacon? Please? MMMMM Crispy Bacon MMMMMM I wish I had some. But I'll get started on those eggs....
  17. You get eggs and white toast and hot coco.....how would you like your eggs cooked?
  18. You have to be in my gargage stealing my wheels cuz they beat your wheelz!
  19. Geckoone go make your own %^^ dinner, my Luv! Going to lay by my dish as requested by my luv!
  20. Since you keep bring up this point, I have to make an observation: I'm STILL not buying into the fact that the other 5 of 6 adults could all be that naive. So you admit that at least one person in your party KNEW all along? Why was there no mention of THIS person in the news article? That person didn't go just to see your reaction. There was a back-up cachin' agenda that they wanted to be part of and it sounds like the whole party enjoyed it or did the seethers just sit in the car and polish their angst? That coupled with 2 missed opportunities to confront the cache owner in person cements most of the subsequent actions as vindictive and wrong. It appears to me you/they did what you/they did out of pure mean spirit. Remember, I said "appears." Back to this: It appears (there's that word again) LO has apologized BEFORE your latest post that I quoted: The cache is now archived directly relating to this matter. An innocent reporter has been stripped of her childlike wonder for caching and now LO has apologized. Does she need to come back and wish she had informed you better publicly for the two months of messyness to end? I'm kinda wondering how long the "We didn't know," and "We spent our hard earned money," points are going to linger on. In light of all that has transpired there is no clean victory to be had and it appears that there never was one. I'm sorry I wasn't very clear the one that knew knew because we called him that night after we found it and knew the truth. Sorry about that.
  21. Vinny = Non gullible. _______ (<~~insert name) = gullible. So much drama makes my hair hurt & my teeth itch. Personally, my own preferred way of phrasing it is not in terms of "gullible", but rather, Vinny and many others did their research and paid attention, and some other cachers, namely some from MN, did not do their due diligence research or did not pay attention. And my ultimate point, of course, for those who made themselves "victims" is: why blame someone else, such as the cache owner, for your own failure to perform due diligence? We did, we contacted the owner. As a multi it would be hard to know where it leads you so checking maps which we did to a degree, will only tell you so much such as what the terrain of the starting point looks like. I know several multi's here in MN that drive you around to different places within a 10 mile area, looking at the maps does you jackcrack. We also talked to a few other cachers who had heard from others that this was trully a hard cache and not a liar's cache. I will admit I didn't read all but a few logs - why cuz I don't. I hate when spoilers are included as they are so many times so I avoid reading the logs until I get back. In this case I will admit after reading the logs it was somewhat abvious (lack of DNF's) that some of the stories were WAY out there but then again I know cacher who love to write whoppers on thier logs just cuz they can.
  22. You know, and this applies to a much greater range of caches than the small field of tall tale caches, I would much rather that a cache be overrated a bit on Terrain than underrated. Nothing annoys me more than to get to a cache with a Terrain rating of 1 or 2, only to discover that we are expected to climb a tree or climb on the roof of a 7 foot tall bus stop shelter; I am not annoyed so much for myself as for those cachers who may be handicapped, or who may not have either the physical skills (or ability) or preference to tackle a high-Terrain-rating cache! I agree to a certain extent, over rating a bit is okay but there is a HUGE difference froma 1.5 to a 4.5.
  23. Your post reminded me of two things. First, is all the whiners who insist on getting some way to easily sort out caches that they don't like. Second, are all the cachers who state that they only really enjoy caches that take them on a hike and challenge them. I will say this was one of the reasons for our disapointment as we were all looking for a hard difficulty cache, we've done a few true tough ones since then and find them to be wonderful esp when spaced out between other caches. We went to the first stage to check the true terrain (and found out the truth) because we had one in our group that was not going to be able to possibly do it depending on how trully difficult it looked as he had a bad back so we essentailly had to go out and check things out before the next morning only to discover the truth.
×
×
  • Create New...