Jump to content

Atilla the Pun

Members
  • Posts

    252
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Atilla the Pun

  1. Some sites (like Geocaching.com) use HDD MM.MMM

     

    Other's use UTM, or DD.DDD.

     

    So what I'm asking is, are you putting in your home co-ords in the format requested, and does the site have a map for that location?

     

    If you live in the US, you should be pretty will covered between Map Blast, TopoZone, MS Terraserver, and a bunch of other places. Outside the US I'm not at all sure what the coverage is like, but TopoZone uses USGS maps, and they map the world, so you should be covered there.....

     

    AtP

  2. Some sites (like Geocaching.com) use HDD MM.MMM

     

    Other's use UTM, or DD.DDD.

     

    So what I'm asking is, are you putting in your home co-ords in the format requested, and does the site have a map for that location?

     

    If you live in the US, you should be pretty will covered between Map Blast, TopoZone, MS Terraserver, and a bunch of other places. Outside the US I'm not at all sure what the coverage is like, but TopoZone uses USGS maps, and they map the world, so you should be covered there.....

     

    AtP

  3. quote:
    Originally posted by CrossRidgers:

    I did a bit of research on the Garmin rino's. There are 2 models- the 110 which is FRS and there is the 120 which is the FRS/GMRS. They are indeed compatable with any other FRS or GMRS radios.

     

    FYI- the GPS unit on the 120 is similar to the Legend unit but with a better antenna.

     

    Very cool gadgets.

     

    -CrossRidgers


     

    Could you please point me to the source of your information that shows the 110 as FRS? And I seriously doubt that the 120 is truely a FRS/GMRS hybrid. I am far more inclined to believe that it is a GMRS radio. GMRS shares the bottom 7 channles with FRS.

    Respectfully,

     

    AtP

  4. 330x with maps, mount, and cable for $200 is, IMHO the best bang for the buck. I used to think the MeriGold was just a Map 330 in a new shell, but some recent firmware revisions have changed my mind on that.

     

    If you have $300 budgeted I would probably go with the MeriGold (or save a few more $$$and get the Meridian Platinum for under $350 I think). I have used a friend's eTrex Vista, which has some very nice features. However my Map 330x grabs signal from satellites much better than his Vista, so I'm very unimpressed with patch antennas as compared to quad helix. I would stay away from the eTrex line because of that, but there are others on these boards who'll say differently.

    Enjoy!

     

    AtP

  5. 330x with maps, mount, and cable for $200 is, IMHO the best bang for the buck. I used to think the MeriGold was just a Map 330 in a new shell, but some recent firmware revisions have changed my mind on that.

     

    If you have $300 budgeted I would probably go with the MeriGold (or save a few more $$$and get the Meridian Platinum for under $350 I think). I have used a friend's eTrex Vista, which has some very nice features. However my Map 330x grabs signal from satellites much better than his Vista, so I'm very unimpressed with patch antennas as compared to quad helix. I would stay away from the eTrex line because of that, but there are others on these boards who'll say differently.

    Enjoy!

     

    AtP

  6. quote:
    Originally posted by jfitzpat:

    Despite intense brand loyalty,...


     

    Just on the off chance that was directed at me, I have no brand loyalty. I cited the field experience I had (patch antenna vs quad helix, patch lost) and pointed to features that seemed to be what the poster requested.

     

    Thanks for your input about the MeriPlat's compass, I will research that further before deciding on my next GPS. I was leaning towards the MeriPlat, not becuase it's Magellan but for the features vs cost. Now I'll check it out. The 76S looks good too, especially with the external antenna connector, but cost is a factor.

     

    AtP

  7. quote:
    Originally posted by GOT GPS?:

    To display mapping on an external device requires computing hardware.

     

    What you are asking cannot be done.


     

    So certain are you? Always with you it can not be done.voice>

     

    I might also add that I am not "asking" for anything, I am offering something if there is interest.

     

    quote:
    I have been in electronics for years, and studied GPS technology.

     

    I worked in Defense electronics for over 12 years before starting a new career as a computer technician, sysadmin, network admin, etc. Many devices other than PC's use RS-232 serial ports.

     

    quote:
    Only 3 ways to see mapping on an external display:

    1) Digital video out


     

    I disgarded this idea right off the bat.

     

    quote:
    2) Computing hardware to convert the data out of a gps into something that you can see on an external screen.

     

    Methods this might be accomplished by will be left as an excercise for the student. Let me just add that "computing hardware" does not absolutely mean PC hardware and software.

     

    quote:
    3)modify existing gps units to work with an external display panel.


     

    This seems the same as #1 above to me.

     

    No disrespect is intended in any of my above responses. I just want you to be aware that I am looking for a solution that does not yet exist and I am considering developing it. Wether or not I come to market with a finished product is another issue entirely.

    Respectfully,

     

    AtP

  8. The Windows Calculator (Start | Run and type in "calc" and hit Enter) will convert between Decimal, Hexidecimal, Binary and Octal. When the calculator is running click on View | Scientific and you'll see buttons to change the base. Select the base to start with (Hex for the raw Geocache number) and type in the number, then click on the base you want to convert to.

     

    AtP

  9. ...you really don't get what I'm trying to accomplish here, do you? If I wanted a laptop or tablet (pen-top) PC I'd go buy one. This is not what I want for numerous reasons, including power consumption, cost, durability and many others. I'll grant that what I'm looking at is a niche market within a niche market. However I think the market is there, and if it isn't, it won't take that much to find out.

     

    AtP

  10. quote:
    Originally posted by gnbrotz:

    Tonight I picked up two BellSouth FRS/GMRS radios for $10 each. They were actually cheaper the the FRS only models they had. After reviewing the forums and visiting http://www.gmrsweb.com/ , I think I've learned a few things. I'll list my observations below for comments from anyone who could help me learn more.

     

    1. The amateur radio community is not in favor of these types of combo radios, because they feel it will lead to the degredation, and ultimately the deregulation of the GMRS channels.


     

    GMRS has nothing to do with Amature radio it's a different license and a different frequency. But you are correct about the feeling among GMRS licensees. These are probably not "combo" radios, contrary to the propaganda from Bell South's marketing droids. They are GMRS radios that have been "stripped down" to run with reduced power. GMRS and FRS share the bottom seven frequencies. While these radios may have a 1/2W output on the lower 7 channels (rather than the 5W available to GMRS) they are probably still set up for the frequency deviation for GMRS rather than FRS.

     

    quote:
    2. My radio lists 500mW TX power output, so although GMRS is capable of a longer range than FRS, my units specifically will be limited because of the low power output.

     

    That's probably a good assesment. Also, can you change the antenna? No FRS radio can have a removeable antenna. If you can change the antenna then these are GMRS radios. The antenna can be used to increase the transmitter gain over 1/2 W.

     

    quote:
    3. I will have to purchase a license to (legally) use the GMRS channels on my radio. With the limited power output of my radio, all I would gain for my $75 license fee is an additional 8 channels to use, but no real improved performance over an FRS radio.

     

    You will have to purchase a GMRS license to legally use any of the features of this radio, for the reasons stated above. Go back to the GMRS Web board and post the FCC ID number of these radios and ask if they are truely GMRS or if they might an actual hybrid FRS/GMRS radio. I just kind of dabble in this stuff on the side.

     

    I haven't opened any of the packages yet (I wanted to do this bit of research first), but it seems I will be keeping them (because they were so cheap) and utilizing them as FRS only, unless I can uncover some beneficial reason to spring for the license fee.

     

    Thanks in advance for your input.

     

    Greg

    N 39

×
×
  • Create New...