Jump to content

jrav

+Charter Members
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jrav

  1. Sounds like jrav should also be representing the cachers in BC.

    Brian wants ALL cachers to present their thoughts on the BC Parks policy.

     

    My response is I would like to see geocachers themselves propose ways that geocaching can be done in parks in a manner that respects the natural environment and meets the concerns we have.

    So additional representatives are not required. We can ALL post our proposals in these forums. BC Parks will monitor the forums, and all voices will be heard.

  2. Brian's response follows. He asks that people do not email him directly. While he does want to hear cachers opinions, he does not want a whack of emails flooding his inbox.

     

    Please post your responses in this forum so he may read them.

     

    Thanks Jessica for your note.  I appreciate your interest in this issue as

    well as your comments about the article from August. 

     

    Awareness of geocaching in provincial parks has been growing internally for

    over a year.  Initially, contact with a representative from geocaching.com

    and representatives from BCGA came to us rather than us contacting them.

    They were the only two groups, until your note below, that I was aware of.

    One of the challenges we will have in developing policy for parks and

    protected areas is finding a way to be as inclusive as possible for comments

    on policy issues.  Perhaps the use of the forums may be a way to best

    achieve this.

     

    I have had one informal meeting with 2 members of the BCGA and one from

    geocaching.com.  The meeting was "high level" in that we did not get into

    specific policy development or direction, instead concentrating on

    principles, concerns, education, and awareness of issues that will come up

    as policy is developed.  The next step is for us to set up the process to

    build the policy.  We hope to undertake much of this work over the winter.

     

    I noted in the forum discussion quite a range of opinions, assumptions and

    concerns about what the eventual policy will entail.  A couple of points

    perhaps that I could make early on in this discussion are:

     

    1. Policy for managing geocaching does not currently exist.  However,

    legislation and regulations do exist that may apply to activities related to

    geocaching.  For example, nothing prohibits a person from walking through a

    park with a GPS unit looking for something.  However, disturbing a natural

    resource is prohibited under the Park Act.  An example would be a cache I

    know of in a park where the person who placed it marked certain locations by

    spray painting orange dots on trees. The activity of spray painting trees is

    a violation.  Geocachers need to be aware that specific activities may in

    fact be illegal.

     

    2. I think its fairly straight-forward what concerns park managers

    would have related to geocaching.  These include digging or disturbing

    natural resources, trail cutting or off-trail travel, increasing numbers of

    caches that become abandoned (i.e. never taken out) etc.  Comments in the

    forums speak to "shouldn't let parks control the situation".  My response is

    I would like to see geocachers themselves propose ways that geocaching can

    be done in parks in a manner that respects the natural environment and meets

    the concerns we have.  I would bet 99% of all geocachers already operate in

    this way so bringing a management framework for geocaching forward to us is

    a great way to be both proactive and help us develop good policy.

     

    3. Finally, I want mention that while I do think geocaching will be

    positive for parks, we all have to recognize that even the best policies are

    built from "give and take".  Not everyone will get everything and not

    everyone will be happy.  Ultimately we want a policy that we can point to

    and affirm that if we abide by it, we continue to respect and protect our

    parks while having a great time in them.

     

    Regards,

     

    Brian

  3. Here is a copy of the message I sent to Brian Bawtinheimer of PC Parks:

     

    Hello Brian,

     

    As an avid geocacher since December 2001, I was delighted to read

    your positive comments in the Times Colonist article on August 13th

    titled "Follow those satellites to better health: B.C. Parks is

    looking for the best way to welcome tech-savvy hikers".

     

    The article states "B.C. Parks has asked two of the main geocaching

    organizations for some ideas on a policy covering the use of parks."

     

    I appreciate that you have asked geocaching organizations for their

    input on this issue, but I worry that the feelings of the majority of

    B.C. geocachers may not be heard. Geocachers participate in online

    forums, but most of them don't bother to join organizations.

     

    Vancouver Island, for example, has more than 250 active geocachers.

    The mainland has at least triple that amount. The B.C. Geocaching

    Association has just 33 members -- only about one per cent of the

    number of active geocachers in B.C. -- so certainly does not speak

    for the vast majority of geocachers.

     

    There are two major geocaching forums for B.C. geocachers.

     

    One is on geocaching.com, a "for profit" company based in Seattle,

    and the major stakeholder in these discussions. The BCGA does not

    participate in these forums, other than to tell us that discussions

    about BC Parks are underway. As geocachers, we have no idea what is

    being discussed.

     

    The other forum is for people who actively seek and hide caches on

    Vancouver Island. I am the webmaster of vigps.com, a community for

    Vancouver Island GPS users. All of our 178 members are active

    geocachers, ranging in age from their 20s to late 60s. We have been

    discussing the issue of caching in parks both on and off the website,

    and while there are not many caches in BC Parks on the Island at this

    time, we all agree that it would be a shame to lose the opportunity

    to go caching in a BC Park.

     

    I encourage you to join the BC Parks discussion forums on

    geocaching.com, vigps.com, or both, to let the geocachers know your

    side of the issue, and to help us understand the changes BC Parks

    intends to make to our hobby.

  4. Let us hear from you -- post a note here if you would be interested, and how many you might like to order to give us some idea of whether or not to pursue this further.

    We would probably take 5, but like Gorak mentioned, it would depend upon the final design.

  5. It's getting close to membership renewal time....Will the new BCGA executive be giving consideration to family memberships? I'm guessing the the current $1 per month covers only one of us who cache under the "jrav" name.

  6. Yes,  But mine is FREE.  And I'll be making them a little larger than the one shown so other brands of GPSr's will fit in them. 

    Like these?

    28_14.jpg

     

    We've placed about a hundred in caches and people seem to pick them up pretty quick. The camo bags are the most popular.

  7. quote:

    High tech no help for hikers

     

    By Paul Rudan

    Three Victoria hikers equipped with high-tech navigation equipment still managed to get lost in the dense woods of Strathcona Park.


     

    No, they were not lost. They knew exactly where they were, and where they were headed. They had however, not anticipated the time it would take to traverse the terrain, given continuous rain and snowpack.

     

    quote:
    The three men were found safe and sound Monday, three days after they had set out on a modern, technology-enhanced scavenger hunt known as geocaching.

    “They were well-prepared with tarps for shelter and GPS receivers and laptop computers with navigational software, but unfortunately they had the wrong information from the beginning,” said Dan McManus, information officer for Campbell River Search and Rescue.


     

    Yes, they had tarps, GPS receivers and computers, but also had paper maps and compasses. The “wrong information from the beginning” refers to an incorrectly projected waypoint.

     

    quote:
    “The men hiked for several hours before they realized it wasn’t what they expected,” McManus said. “The terrain was very rough and the tree cover was dense. They became delayed to the point where they were 24 hours overdue and scrambled around in the bush trying to find a route out. The men became exhausted and decided to wait at a lake they came across.”

     

    The fact that they were 24 hours overdue from their expected return time is correct, but the remainder is not.

     

    They did not “scramble around in the bush trying to find a route out”. The lake they were stopped at is a campsite - they were camping.

     

    This article contains much erroneous information, also neglected to mention many facts that are both interesting, and truthful.

     

    The three men have over a 100 years of combined backcountry experience. One has served as a Search and Rescue technician. One has had extensive training in wilderness survival. One has extensive training in map reading and navigation.

    All had enough food for 4 more days. They were never in any danger, and were never off their intended route, or lost.

     

    They knew they were over 24 hours overdue, and every good backpacker knows they should have someone responsible aware of their plans and intended return date. As expected, the RCMP was contacted once this time period had passed. As expected, the SAR helicopter could be heard dropping off ground crew.

     

    So they prepared for the “rescue” by arranging the tarps to reflect light, placing pine boughs in a large arrow on a snow covered hillside, and stood by with flairs at the ready for when the helicopter was within sighting range.

     

    There is no doubt that the drastic change in weather and unexpected soft snowpack impeded their progress, causing them to fall behind schedule. However, their preplanning with food, shelter, emergency equipment and numerous packets of fresh batteries, ensured that this was far from a life threatening experience.

     

    This article does not reflect the experience.

  8. quote:

    High tech no help for hikers

     

    By Paul Rudan

    Three Victoria hikers equipped with high-tech navigation equipment still managed to get lost in the dense woods of Strathcona Park.


     

    No, they were not lost. They knew exactly where they were, and where they were headed. They had however, not anticipated the time it would take to traverse the terrain, given continuous rain and snowpack.

     

    quote:
    The three men were found safe and sound Monday, three days after they had set out on a modern, technology-enhanced scavenger hunt known as geocaching.

    “They were well-prepared with tarps for shelter and GPS receivers and laptop computers with navigational software, but unfortunately they had the wrong information from the beginning,” said Dan McManus, information officer for Campbell River Search and Rescue.


     

    Yes, they had tarps, GPS receivers and computers, but also had paper maps and compasses. The “wrong information from the beginning” refers to an incorrectly projected waypoint.

     

    quote:
    “The men hiked for several hours before they realized it wasn’t what they expected,” McManus said. “The terrain was very rough and the tree cover was dense. They became delayed to the point where they were 24 hours overdue and scrambled around in the bush trying to find a route out. The men became exhausted and decided to wait at a lake they came across.”

     

    The fact that they were 24 hours overdue from their expected return time is correct, but the remainder is not.

     

    They did not “scramble around in the bush trying to find a route out”. The lake they were stopped at is a campsite - they were camping.

     

    This article contains much erroneous information, also neglected to mention many facts that are both interesting, and truthful.

     

    The three men have over a 100 years of combined backcountry experience. One has served as a Search and Rescue technician. One has had extensive training in wilderness survival. One has extensive training in map reading and navigation.

    All had enough food for 4 more days. They were never in any danger, and were never off their intended route, or lost.

     

    They knew they were over 24 hours overdue, and every good backpacker knows they should have someone responsible aware of their plans and intended return date. As expected, the RCMP was contacted once this time period had passed. As expected, the SAR helicopter could be heard dropping off ground crew.

     

    So they prepared for the “rescue” by arranging the tarps to reflect light, placing pine boughs in a large arrow on a snow covered hillside, and stood by with flairs at the ready for when the helicopter was within sighting range.

     

    There is no doubt that the drastic change in weather and unexpected soft snowpack impeded their progress, causing them to fall behind schedule. However, their preplanning with food, shelter, emergency equipment and numerous packets of fresh batteries, ensured that this was far from a life threatening experience.

     

    This article does not reflect the experience.

  9. Wow - you must have dug deep in the pile to dredge up this thread.

     

    My database tells me that the at the end of December 2001, there were 30 caches on Vancouver Island.

     

    There were 13 caches in the Victoria area:

    Building42 - Herbie and Irvings Revenge

    Building42 - Portage Zydeco

    Christmas in July

    Teddy Bears Picnic

    Anderson Hill

    SLC 2002 Olympic Cache (Archived)

    Mt. Doug

    Lone Tree Cache

    Gowland Ridge

    Peaceful Waters Cougar cache

    Mackenzie Bight By land or Water

    John Dean

    Horth

     

    Sooke and west (Juan de Fuca) had 8 plantman caches.

     

    Up Island, there were 6 caches:

    Waterfalls of Rain

    Great Central Treasure

    Little Mountain Cache

    Mr. Happy

    Cache on the Cape

    The White Collection

     

    The adjacent islands had 3 caches:

    Baileys

    Pender Island Portage

    Galiano Island Cache

     

    As of today, there are 244 active caches on Vancouver Island, and 52 archived. Thats about $1000 worth of plastic containers bought in one year.

  10. One of the many great things about Geocaching is that you do not HAVE to do the types of caches you do not enjoy. If you don't like the Team KFWB caches, then don't do them. Personally, I'm not a fan of Virtuals, or the type of caches where a dozen can be logged in one day.

     

    There are plenty of regular caches in the area. I located a few that you (MarinerBC) have not yet visited and they sound like great hikes!

     

    There are two by GoldGuru that sound interesting:

    Mt Bolduc

    Mount Empress

     

    Caches by Dagg are always worthy of the visit:

    Obsessed with Punishment

    Rednecks & Wildflowers

     

    Although we have been successful in locating the treasure in the Team KFWB caches, it is not all about the money. We have discovered some fantastic areas while doing their caches. One cache clue lead us to the base of a peak that looked too enticing to pass by, so up we went, spending about 4 hours in an area we otherwise would have not discovered. We have also taken waypoints at locations that we plan to explore in greater detail once spring returns.

     

    You should not feel the need to retire - just ignore the caches you do not want to do. You ignore the Team KFWB caches, I'll ignore the virtuals, and we'll both be happy cachers. icon_smile.gif

  11. We went to a cache last weekend that originally contained $100. Operation Western Command

     

    Those before us took $10 each and left their standard (worth much less than $10) trade items. We took $10 and left a cheapo pencil sharpener. As I noted in my log, it didn't feel right, but everyone else did it. We still feel guilty - just because everyone else does it doesn't make it the right thing to do, so we plan to go back this weekend to leave something nicer.

  12. quote:
    Originally posted by Goldguru:

    i think i must agree with jrav.........does yers lock in inside your housse???? mine does........

    gm100....Gg


     

    Yes! Our GM100 does indeed get a lock in the house....although we cannot navigate from the PC room to the kitchen.

×
×
  • Create New...