Jump to content

LazyLeopard

Members
  • Posts

    326
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by LazyLeopard

  1. quote:
    For example, Lazy Leopard - you not a leopard (well your photo doesn't look like one), and presumably not you are not that lazy, as you like to get out and find geocaches.
    Way back in October last year when I was thinking about registering on geocaching.com, it just seemed most folks used a nickname rather than their "real" name. When I was trying to think of a suitable nickname it just tripped out. Or maybe I'm remembering a kids book I read to my nieces and nephews recently. Or something. Either way I liked it enough to grab a local domain incorporating it

     

    Purrs... LazyLeopard http://www.lazyleopard.org.uk

  2. quote:
    For example, Lazy Leopard - you not a leopard (well your photo doesn't look like one), and presumably not you are not that lazy, as you like to get out and find geocaches.
    Way back in October last year when I was thinking about registering on geocaching.com, it just seemed most folks used a nickname rather than their "real" name. When I was trying to think of a suitable nickname it just tripped out. Or maybe I'm remembering a kids book I read to my nieces and nephews recently. Or something. Either way I liked it enough to grab a local domain incorporating it

     

    Purrs... LazyLeopard http://www.lazyleopard.org.uk

  3. icon_eek.gif It seems one of the problems with the import of threads from the old forums is that some threads have been mostly duplicated, though sometimes with some chunks missing. icon_frown.gif One version (usually the less complete, as far as I can tell) tends to have the date of its first post against it rather than that of its last post, so I guess folks are more likely to find the better copy... icon_wink.gif

     

    Purrs... LazyLeopard http://www.lazyleopard.org.uk

  4. icon_eek.gif It seems one of the problems with the import of threads from the old forums is that some threads have been mostly duplicated, though sometimes with some chunks missing. icon_frown.gif One version (usually the less complete, as far as I can tell) tends to have the date of its first post against it rather than that of its last post, so I guess folks are more likely to find the better copy... icon_wink.gif

     

    Purrs... LazyLeopard http://www.lazyleopard.org.uk

  5. Some places it's just not sensible to hide anything, however well labelled. We had a discussion in the UK forum recently about caches placed in locations that (to a UK resident) were likely to cause problems. They were micro-caches in a railway station and an airport. Many of us have experienced travel delays as a result of bomb warnings and so on, and PA announcements about not leaving anything un-attended are made at airports and railway stations frequently. The concensus was that the caches should be removed (with the hider's agreement). If such a location nevertheless cries out for a cache then there's always the virtual cache option.

     

    Purrs... LazyLeopard http://www.lazyleopard.org.uk

  6. quote:
    you get your ugly mug shot show too.

     

    Well, you did until Jeremy had to turn the new style back off because it had broken so many browsers. If you were using IE under Windows you were probably Ok. If you weren't, you got weirdness like black text on a black background, and fonts three feet high, and...

     

    InfoPop are working on fixing it, apparently...

     

    Purrs... LazyLeopard http://www.lazyleopard.org.uk

  7. quote:
    Just to make sure, does this look ok now?

     

    Yep, thanks, it's readable now. I expect (part of) the problem was that something was relying entirely on CSS, JavaScript, or some such. CSS is fine for refining the look of a page but if the pages don't display sensibly without CSS enabled then folks with older browsers (and folks who browse with CSS disabled) will have problems.

     

    Purrs... LazyLeopard http://www.lazyleopard.org.uk

  8. quote:
    Just to make sure, does this look ok now?

     

    Yep, thanks, it's readable now. I expect (part of) the problem was that something was relying entirely on CSS, JavaScript, or some such. CSS is fine for refining the look of a page but if the pages don't display sensibly without CSS enabled then folks with older browsers (and folks who browse with CSS disabled) will have problems.

     

    Purrs... LazyLeopard http://www.lazyleopard.org.uk

×
×
  • Create New...