Jump to content

mikemtn

+Charter Members
  • Posts

    480
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mikemtn

  1. I believe a "Charter" member is anyone that had a GC.com account within the first 1 or 2 years of the website going live. If you had to be a paying member in that 1 or 2 years to be a "charter" I don't know. I would think not but it's how ever TPTB decided to delegate that status.

    Charter members are members who purchased a premium membership during the first year it was offered and have kept it current. It wasn't offered until around March 2002.

     

    There ya go...

    Close enough for me, on to the next question.

  2. I think that everybody is missing a very important point. We're talking about 8-9 years from now. So are we going to have the same old smartphones and other high tech stuff? I doubt there will even be cellphones as we know them now at that point in the future. Smartphones are evolving rapidly. The next Motorola smartphone (Razr) will have a Gorilla glass screen with a Kevlar back and be water resistant (nobody seems to want to say how water resistant, I read in one review maybe a quick dip).

     

    I'm thinking along the lines of a robot type thing with built in location finders and cameras and pencils and stuff that we can sent to find or hide a cache and there will be on need for any of the used to be high tech as we know them today toys. Well, maybe not this drastic, but who knows?

  3. not an issue in Canada

    since this is the general, "all nations" geocaching forums and this seems to be a US specific issue why not start the thread in that region's forum?

     

    Which region would that be? There's not a U.S. forum. There are several subforums for different areas of the U.S., but this isn't a Northwest or Great Plains only issue. This board seems to be the most appropriate place to have the discussion.

     

    OP is talking about Florida, which is his home too, so South and Southeast section will be fitting

    HUH!!!

  4. Widespread cheating is one of the reasons I decided to stop logging all my finds. No one but me really knows how many caches I have found. This is just my way of dealing with those who blatantly cheat. I can't control their behavior and way of playing, but I sure can control mine!

    There's only 3 Geocaching rules that I know of.

     

    Quote from the Geocaching FAQ.......

     

    "What are the rules of geocaching?

     

    1. If you take something from the geocache (or "cache"), leave something of equal or greater value.

    2. Write about your find in the cache logbook.

    3. Log your experience at www.geocaching.com."

  5. I don't really know if I'm allergic, actually

    Shooting pain

    Pain for an excessive duration. (like my spreading pain)

    Excessive swelling (more than 4")

    Excessive redness (more than 4")

    Hives

    Swelling of the mouth and/or throat

    Nausea

    Vomiting

    Anxiety

    Chest pain

    Low blood pressure (weakness or fainting)

    Large portions to entire body itches

    .....and sometimes death

  6. I have a couple that are in Tennessee State Parks. The latest I've heard about Tennessee State Park Caches is that they let the old caches stay but they don't allow any new ones. I see no reason to deprive the parks of caches plus they are self maintaining and require no effort from me. Well, I just asked Google about the Tennessee State Park rules and Wiki says you can hide them with a permit. I don't think permission was in the Geocaching vocabulary when these were hidden. I can just imagine me trying to get a permit from them. Anyway, the rangers (at least the ones from a few years ago) know about them so I reckon they'll archive them if they want them gone.

  7. I would be curious to know if the admins would treat DNF logs the same as Found It logs and reinstate them if you asked them to. My way of thinking, the only reason to delete any log is if it's inappropriate with cursing or something.

    Groundspeak will restore deleted DNF logs and correct the cache owner's misunderstanding of logging principles in examples like the one described by the OP. I speak from personal experience with my player account. I am sorry to hear that there are CO's in the OP's area who do this.

    Thanks Keystone

  8. A quote by Jeremy from the Waymarking forums from long ago.

     

    "Posted 09 September 2005 - 12:18 PM

     

    If I say the word "bounties" - what do you think you could do with that idea?

     

    Jeremy Irish"

     

    From this thread (from long ago).

     

    What happened to this idea? Wasn't this supposed to sort of compensate for the lack of smilies in Waymarking?

  9. For my categories, I guess I have varying photo requirements:

     

    Instructions for Posting a Holiday Displays Waymark:

    - A picture of the display is required for posting a waymark to this category. Your GPSr does not need to be in the shot, but please only submit waymarks for displays that you have personally visited.

    Instructions for Visiting a Waymark in this Category:

    - A picture of the display is required for visiting a waymark in this category. You should be in the picture with your GPSr.

     

    Instructions for Posting a Jazz Clubs Waymark:

    - If you can provide a picture of the location it would be great, but providing a picture of someone (preferably yourself) performing at that location would be just awesome.

    Instructions for Visiting a Waymark in this Category:

    - There are no log instructions listed for this category.

     

    Instructions for Posting a Musical Instruments Waymark:

    - You must include a picture of the instrument to post it here.

    Instructions for Visiting a Waymark in this Category:

    - There are no log instructions listed for this category.

     

    Instructions for Posting a Musician Statues Waymark:

    - Your waymark must include a picture of the statue and a brief description of who the musician is along with one of their more notable (no pun intended) musical accomplishments.

    Instructions for Visiting a Waymark in this Category:

    - Your log must include a picture of you with the statue.

     

     

     

    So three of my four require a picture to post a waymark, two require a picture to visit with one specifically stating the GPSr should be in the shot.

    I keep thinking I'm done with this but maybe you're the one to answer my primary question. Why have logging requirements and not require them.

  10. I was against ALR's long before Geocaching knew what they were. Don't even ask my feeling about the GPS picture thing to post a Waymark. (There's still at least one of those I know of.)

     

    I believe there are three categories that do require gps photos to post a Waymark (they don't get many waymarks from me because I never remember to take the gps photo). This excludes the categories where gps photos actually make sense such as Confluence Spots, Coordinate Palindromes and GPS Art.

     

    Do you talk about posting a waymark or about visiting a existing one? I have never cared about the requirements for the former, but haver encountered many waymarks where a photo is required for the visit. I though that mikemtn was referring to visiting waymarks.

     

     

    Cezanne

    We started out discussing visiting and I just threw in the comment about posting. If there's only three categories left that require a GPS pic to post a Waymark it would be easy enough to ignore them. My original argument was that Waymarking is not Geocaching. If somebody had started Waymarking as a complete stand alone thing instead of trying to merge it with Locationless caches I believe it would have been a whole different game.

  11. ... "To log a waymark in this category, please provide a photograph that shows you (or your GPS receiver, if you're Waymarking solo) and the place."

     

    I never was able to live with that requirement and as I remember there was hardly anybody enforcing it.

    But it cheapened the site for me and I just quit playing their game the unprofessional (the way I saw it) way it was being played. I guess it was I wasn't able to break the rules just because everybody else was doing it.

    Why weren't you willing to abide by that requirement?

    I was against ALR's long before Geocaching knew what they were. Don't even ask my feeling about the GPS picture thing to post a Waymark. (There's still at least one of those I know of.)

  12. I really never did understand the why of Waymarking but I really enjoyed it for a time. I was working away from home and it gave me something to do when I was stuck out of town on weekends. I guess what ruined it for me was there was a total lack of any kind of supervision. This is a quote from the National Register of Historic Places Instructions for Visiting a Waymark in this Category which is a common requirement on the site. (I use this example knowing that BruseS is very active in this category and maybe I can hear his thoughts on it):

     

    "To log a waymark in this category, please provide a photograph that shows you (or your GPS receiver, if you're Waymarking solo) and the place."

     

    I never was able to live with that requirement and as I remember there was hardly anybody enforcing it.

    But it cheapened the site for me and I just quit playing their game the unprofessional (the way I saw it) way it was being played. I guess it was I wasn't able to break the rules just because everybody else was doing it.

  13. Somewhere in my memory from a few years ago there was an issue with a user name that went around the forums for a while. If I remember GS tried to get him to change it and he wouldn't do it. I don't remember if he finally changed it or got banned or what. The name started with Up. Somebody with more memory cells can probably remember more about it.

    Upinyachit?

    Yeah, what happened to him?

×
×
  • Create New...