Jump to content

Splendidz

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    72
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Splendidz

  1. Thanks everyone for the fantastic entries :D

     

    After much deliberation I have chosen the winner..... and that is.... (drumroll please).....

     

    Happy Humphrey for the photo from Clumber Park - as I thought it had an appropriately autumnal feel to it, Congratulations!

     

    97ab4ad6-4207-4a7f-9085-c72f2513431a.jpg

     

    Althought special mention for cheekiness should go to Little-leggs :anicute: as his photo managed to make me laugh and shudder at the same time! :laughing:

     

    And now it's over to you Happy Humphrey...

  2. Many thanks to Clue-72 for choosing my picture as the winner of the September photo competition (which can be viewed here)

     

    As my picture was taken in a flooded fort that was on an island in the Medway estuary - so it was entirely surrounded by water :anibad: I have decided to make the theme for this month - 'Water' please interpret that as you wish! :rolleyes:

     

    The rules are:

    1) The photo must be cache related and to do with a specific UK cache (any type including events), caching series or caching trip - please include a link to the cache or the GC.... code so we can see where the picture relates to.

    2) Maximum of two photos per caching team or cacher.

    3) A new thread is started each month, with the OP stating these rules.

    4) The winner each month is decided by the winner from the previous month - the new winner starting the thread for the subsequent month. They may set a theme if they wish.

    5) Follow the theme

     

    :D Happy snapping! :D

     

    Didz

  3. Warning !

    I shall shortly be moving up to Leicestershire from Surrey.

    Looking forwards to all these caches recommended and of course placing a few of my own.

    I also want to attend local events- nearest group to Newbold Vernon / Market Bosworth ?

    Oooo! Cache U Nutter coming to Leicestershire - That's exciting news B)

    ... I will look forward to doing some more of your mad caches! :P

  4.  

    Splendidz where you off caching and I'll tell you if it's worth going to ;)

     

    I'm off to Norfolk (Nr Beccles) to do some boat caches (a few of them are 5/5*s) I'm sure I'll have fun doing them whatever they are rated at ;) ... but I'm always keen to hear about more challenging 5/5s!

  5. So, why was the difficulty level set to 5? Was the cache extremely well-disguised, or was it a really hard puzzle that took weeks of work? I'm unlikely to attempt this one but it would be interesting to know what a genuine 5* difficulty cache consists of. The terrain rating is a bit easier to grade and I can believe that this example is worth 5* if it's a 200ft climb up a pole.

    I expect the difficult bit is doing it without getting arrested ;)

     

    I'm off to do some more 5/5* at the weekend and none of them seem to be too tricky... so will I be disappointed if none of them are a challenge? Maybe a little :rolleyes:

     

    Will I still enjoy doing them? Oh yes, I expect so! :D

     

    So will it really matter that they're overrated? Nope! :laughing:

  6. I was wondering if reviewers could ask a few questions at the publishing stage for a 5/5* to check it really suits the grading? (as they do when you try to set a 1*Terrain) especially if the CO isn't an experienced extreme cacher.

    I can't see that being at all practical; although ideally reviewers would at least ask for the CO to check, if it appears from the description that the cache is massively overgraded, I doubt that they'd have the time or inclination.

    I have found 49 5/5*s and IMHO probably only about a quarter of them were true 5/5*s (which I think should be a serious challenge/scare you stupid - or preferably both!)... I suppose all these 5/5s do make my stats look quite good though B):anibad:

    How about you put together a bookmark list of "genuine" 5/5 caches? Then those who want a real challenge (as opposed to an easy way to collect lots of high-rated caches) will have some help.

    Yes, you're probably right and the reviewers have enough to do without policing D/T ratings - although maybe a standard reply for 5/5*s redirecting the owner to Clayjar's rating system may make them think twice about the rating?!?

     

    Good idea about the bookmark list.... whether I ever get round to doing it though is another matter!

    :laughing:

  7. I have just come back from a short trip to Essex where we did nine 5/5*s... and not one of them was anything like a 5* diff (a couple of them needed boats so were 5*T, the others were not very high treeclimbs and paddling under a bridge!) :rolleyes: ... but I have to say I didn't really comment they were over-rated in my logs - as people may have got annoyed if it affected their stats if they were down-rated because of my comments!

     

    I was wondering if reviewers could ask a few questions at the publishing stage for a 5/5* to check it really suits the grading? (as they do when you try to set a 1*Terrain) especially if the CO isn't an experienced extreme cacher.

     

    I have found 49 5/5*s and IMHO probably only about a quarter of them were true 5/5*s (which I think should be a serious challenge/scare you stupid - or preferably both!)... I suppose all these 5/5s do make my stats look quite good though B):anibad:

  8. Is it just me who loves the idea of geocaching on horseback?

     

    Not sure it'd actually work out cheaper than running a car though.

     

    I sometimes go caching by Horse :D only when the cache are within riding distance of the yard though - as the Horsebox uses twice as much Diesel as the car :blink: ... and it's a pain getting on and off and trying to hold an impatient horse whilst searching!

     

    Here is Inca The Geohorse with a cache B)

     

    ed878312-a970-4785-8140-ee785c5bdaad.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...