Jump to content

bittsen

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    4782
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bittsen

  1. I could do a thin closed foam gasket real easy, thanks for the suggestion, even a thin leather seal glued to the metal could do a good job. I will try to do a little work on this thing and place it tomorrow, I will put in some pictures to show how it works out. Larry

     

    Yeah, yours would be easy to add a gasket. I'm glad to hear that you are open to upgrading the container.

     

    Cache on!!

  2. I found several of these types of caches while on Vancouver island. It seems to be the equivalent to micros in a spruce tree.

     

    I thought the first 3 were neat...

     

    Having said that... I live in the land of micros in a spruce tree and have hidden a few that way myself. I might hide some that way.

     

    The ones I found in Vancouver had no wet logs. The ziplock was glued to the fake front in such a way that even if the plastic failed they would be OK.

     

    When and if I do hide one of these, I will check up on it often.

     

    I have an electrical cover hide as well but mine comes with a gasket between the cover and whatever surface it it attached to so the magnets cause the seal to, well, seal.

    It's been out for over a year and during Portlands wettest winter in years and the log is dry. Of course the log IS in a sandwich baggie.

  3. Excellent thought on the baggie problem, I will try to give that some thought. "Hard Drive Magnets", clearely you have some experience in this area of expertice. Larry
    Yeah, I've taken some apart, but I prefer now to buy rare-earth magnets online. They're not that expensive, they come in many, many different sizes, shapes, and strengths, and are easier to obtain than worn-out hard drives.

     

    I wouldn't say that. I have about 40 hard drive magnets within 15 feet of me and at least 2 dozen more distributed between the two companies I work at. (I just recovered 8 in the last 2 days)

     

     

    But I also have an ample selection of Ebay bought magnets too.

  4. You found the cremated remains of a loved one. The box is supposed to survive the elements but will only do so for a relatively short period of time, maybe 10 years normally but possibly a few decades in the desert.
    For the late Geo. Box, perhaps.

     

    Didn't you find something like that once? Or am I just thinking of a thread that you participated in where people were speculating that it was a cremation burial site?

     

    Seriously doubt that it would be a mining claim or anything like that, coralteach. The standard way of staking a claim is (believe it, or not) put the paperwork inside of a tin can, and either put that tin can upside down on a stick in the ground, or in a rock cairn. Pretty high-tech.

     

    I didn't find it. I was just a participant in the thread.

  5. Many people suggest that for those who hate micro sized geocaches to simply filter them out. However, I do not hate micro sized geocaches. I think they are great! What I hate is lame geocaches, which is something that I cannot “filter out” until after I have already found it.

    Like you, I also have a dislike for what I consider to be lame caches. Lame, for me, are those hides, regardless of size, which are hidden in uninspired locations, with little to no thought put into the hide technique. This description accounts for roughly 98.2% of all micro/other/not chosen hides in my area. (Hey, if you don't know any real statistics, make 'em up!) As such, the "Filter Out" solution works wonders for me. For the other 1.8%, I filter out hiders. If I find a small, regular or large that fits my definition of lame, I make a note of the hider. If I see a pattern evolve, with one particular person hiding an excess of caches that hold little interest for me, I won't search for any more of their hides.

     

    And I still end up with way more caches than I'll ever find in my lifetime. :)

     

    Yeah, it really sucks that people don't hide caches without you approving them first.

  6. I don't cache as much when the spiders are out.

     

    I don't like spiders at all.

    I'm not afraid of them, mind you. I hate them more than words can say. Well, I hate them ON me. Away from me I couldn't care less.

  7. Thats it! I am done geocaching!

     

    Why?

     

    A week ago I was going down to a river to place a cache and saw a nice healthy garter snake. He was pretty thick in the middle so he's been eating well. He was only about 2 feet long or so.

    He was sunning himself and didn't see me till it was too late and couldn't get away. I saw the look of fear in his eyes as he tried to remain still, knowing his path to safety was too far away.

    I just squatted down, said hi to the little guy, contemplated picking him up but knowing he would poo on me, and reached out to pet him on the back.

    He didn't try too hard to get away and let me pet him a couple times. Then I gave a gentle flick on his tail to encourage him to go home, which he obliged.

     

    And then I was on my way as well.

     

     

    One of these days I will remember to take pictures of the snakes I see.

  8. Once I found matching gladware containers next to each other. One was the original and the other was a replacement container placed by the CO. Very strange. Signed both logs. Claimed one find. :blink:

     

    Was that in Portland? Cuz I found that exact thing down near the Willamette River.

  9. Was looking for a micro today and found it. Then I found another one very similar to it not many feet away. I reviewed old logs and see the original cache has gone missing and was replaces in Oct'09. I think I probably found the "missing" original and the replacement.

     

    Ever happen to you?

     

    Should I count it as two finds? (just kidding).

     

    Somewhere in the neighborhood of my 20th find I found something like this.

    It was an old abandoned electrical box with a logsheet inside and a bison tube tucked behind it. People were signing both logs so I did too.

  10. The terrain rating is because there is a river near it? 2 finds within 24hrs of posting?

    I think the terrain rating is over-rated.

     

    Terrain is based on my path to the cache. One missed step or slip and you are swimming. Otherwise you have to climb through some bushes/trees with a definate (and likely) cut or bruise.

    In fact, I discovered a nice three inch bruise on my knee today.

     

     

    Mind you, the terrain is based on only 20 feet or so of the trek. It's my understanding that the terrain is based on the hardest part, not the overall path. Otherwise it would only be a 3 or so.

    (It only takes about 15-20 minutes to get to the cache from a car)

     

    But, here's an idea... Go find it and get back to me. ~LOL~

  11. Unless you were right there at the cache, any coordinates from a geotagged photo would only be close, at best.

     

    That is indeed a gorgeous spot for a geocache, Bittsen. I've got to hand it to you.

     

    Thanks.

     

    The pictures were taken from 3 feet away from the cache so they would have been pretty close.

     

    Those pictures don't do the area justice. A few better pictures are on the cache page.

    http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_detai...1c-241e2ebd0a67

  12. Not for a long time, and certainly not on something so far from home and such a tough terrain! OUCH!

     

    Oh well, it gives me a reason to get pictures with a better camera.

     

    soapbowl1.jpgsoapbowl2.jpg

     

    What did you take those pics with?

     

    I have my Blackberry set to geotag all photographs. So if I did what you did, I might be able to save the day by using the coordinates from the photograph.

     

    I should set my MyTouch to geotag in case it happens again.

    THose were taken with the cell phone.

     

    The new pics taken with my Olympus Stylus came out much better.

×
×
  • Create New...