mongoose39uk

I have used this in the past Navigator

I think your right about treading carefully and not loosing the goodwill. Since the initial problems in the area a good relationship has developed. I had noticed over the last couple of weeks a number of new caches coming up in the area so I decided to have a quick check on the numbers. The GAGB committee and the reviewers liaised yesterday evening before taking any action. It may well be that the area can support more caches and I know this is something that Dave (Wombles) will be looking at.

I think so far as Terracaching is concerned it would be down to Individual sponsors/reviewers. I know that the GAGB has tried in the past to contact people further up the tree but with no response. So yes, I would guess it would be possible fro Terracachers to place caches in the New Forest and potentially breach the agreement.

I think that would probably be for The Gathering in the Glens event this year.

Cool. When you've come up with the rules / guidelines, I for one will be more than happy to argue the toss over each and every one of them! Eventually just berating you in the forums...... Berate away lol, just do it nicely Anyway, am going to add Stueys claim at some point over the next few days...... Also I am in the middle of totally redesigning the records pages and moving them to another site. Finally got started, should be a little easier on the eye. Hopefully will be adding some more records and features. Though having bought a new cache mobile and a new GPS................

I will have a think overnight about how best to handle this kind of record, i am sure there is some way of accommodating it. It certainly sets a challenge.

Looks like we may have a claim for Switzerland, Italy and Austria in 2.5 hours

A pint of Bombadier normally works well One of these days I will get round to moving it to a proper page

Strangely am watching this film just now, still a very good film.

Done, though I normally only accept emailed claims. Also added a Junior record (under 16), highest find number by Horrid Henry.

hmm, seem to remember one being mentioned a good while ago but cannot remember who or when Quite happy to list it though

It is back now, I have no idea at the moment what the problem was thoughg. Ta Tony

This thread has been fine no angst. However if Bob feels like me and plenty of other people, then yeah there has been a lot of angst no matter how much you try and wrap it up as a discussion.

Does South Yorkshire count?

Thank you for your long and pretty detailed post on your thoughts about recent events in the forum. Appreciated from my point of view anyway. Sooo............ lets move along and make this a happier place.

near enough, first recoded death. you have the floor

I don't think the side he was on or wasn't on has nay real significance.

/me shrugs, very rare i look in here

Richard Percival was a linen weaver, In 1642 he was shot on Market Street in Manchester. What was significant about this?

Rab B nesbit err and C

I note it was one of the present reviewers who made this exception Log

Congratulations

All posts from that time have the user as unregistered, maybe because the threads were imported from a previous version of the forum.

Tis ok knew you were not serious, also know that I would not wanna be munkehs socks

No, just someone that MrsB talks to regularly and has even cached with. No socks would go near Munkehs feet