Jump to content

jowook

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jowook

  1. -The Vista HCx has a better battery life (25 hours vs. the 18 hours the 60CSx offers)

    -The Vista HCx is smaller and sounds a little more portable.

    -Both seem to have pretty much the same exact features.

    -The 60CSx has the external antenna built on which I'm assuming get's better signal.

    -The 60CSx comes with a microSD card for maps (I already have a 2gb microsd I can put in)

     

    I'd like to add some more points.

    -60 has larger screen that is very important to bikers. Portabality is probably more important to hikers.

    -eTrex H series has an accuracy problem with odometer. This issue has been discussed at this site and Gpspassion.com Gpspassion-eTrex H problem.

    -Some sites say eTrex H series have better sensitivity than 60 Csx with SirfStar III chipset even if it has an external antenna. eTrex H series have MTK chipset

     

    I ordered and received 60 Csx because of odometer accuracy problem.

  2. I currently have a Garmin eTrex Legend and it's worked for me as a beginner. But I'm wanting to upgrade as I always seem to have problems keeping a signal in tree cover or even just on a cloudy day. I've never been able to get a reading better than a 30 foot range.

     

    So if anyone could maybe post what they have and how they like it... pros/cons... that would be great.

     

    Thanks.

     

    -Lori

     

    I think what you want is Garmin eTrex Vista HCX or 60 CSx. Vista HCX is aout $100 cheaper but there is $50 mail-in-rebate promotion on 60 CSx. I liked a kind of a small form factor of Vista but I read a posting about a bug of eTrex H series. You probably want to read this link Gpspassion

    Because of this bug, I just placed an order for 60 HCx at Amazon. I'm still considering returning 60 and reorder Vista because of the size and battery life. (60 Csx:18 hrs, Vista:25hrs)

×
×
  • Create New...