Jump to content

Puppy Dawg

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    461
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Puppy Dawg

  1. It's really just counting more as numbers. The first cache would've been GCA, then GCB, etc. Groundspeak has letters used as numbers, as well as numbers themselves. So really its just cache placement numbers. They go it thei order: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w, x, z, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, but zero may be included, not sure. Older ones just use regular numbers.

  2. Sooner or later someone will post a log that gives it away. I would make sure the final is far enough from the start that folks can't simply brute force the final. Having the final at the same spot as the start seems just a bit too obvious and contrived. Maybe it would work after all since no one would expect it. But that would only work until someone gave it away in their log. So in a circular argument I started out with it being a bad idea and came back to the same opinion.

     

    Any time a night cache has an obvious final it is a bad idea in my opinion.

    Well, I suppose...

     

    So, let me get this straight....

     

    A cloud of tacks, that diminish into none so the cachers "essentially" give up and head back, only to see the real trail?

     

    Yes, i think it will work, though I would be mildly P.O.d that I was led to walk down a trail for no other reason than to trick me.

     

    But that's just me.

     

    In some ways I think it's a great idea.

    No, the cloud of tacks is so there's no chance you will look anywhere that's not ahead of you. Then, it diminishes into a normal amount so you don't turn back. They will end up doing a giant loop and then arriving at the start again. That will be a nano, BTW. It will have coords for the next start point.

     

    They will probably notice them at some point. Most night caches are done by groups of two or three. The cacher in the lead turns to say something to their buddies and sees the tacks. Good news is they will probably think they are so they can find their way back.

    Yeah, didn't think of that.

  3. So here's my idea for a night cache: The first little chunk of it has so many firetacks all around it's impossible o get lost, then that diminishes to a normal amount, and I tack trails making a wide loop and eventually walking on the trail you came in on, back to the starting point where the cache is. My question: Do you think geocachers will turn around and see the trail of tacks behind them?

×
×
  • Create New...