+Briggzz Posted May 29, 2005 Share Posted May 29, 2005 This is a pretty easy question for you experts out there, but when I searched the forums for this the only info I could get on it was from the U.K., and I wasn't sure if it was the same everywhere. When your hiding a cache, what is the distance that you must have from the closest cache in that area to get it approved? Thanks Quote Link to comment
+welch Posted May 29, 2005 Share Posted May 29, 2005 read more here: http://www.geocaching.com/about/guidelines.aspx#sat Quote Link to comment
+QDman Posted May 29, 2005 Share Posted May 29, 2005 528 ft. I thought it was 0.10 miles. Quote Link to comment
+Tagamet Posted May 29, 2005 Share Posted May 29, 2005 read more here: http://www.geocaching.com/about/guidelines.aspx#sat Wow, and I thought that I thought outside the box..... That site talks about "Virtual and Reverse Virtual (or Locationless) Caches". I'm a shrink and I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around the concept of a Locationless Cache. Cool, but very strange. It'd definitely fit in well with Quantum physics though. Tagamet Quote Link to comment
MagicMeeko Posted May 30, 2005 Share Posted May 30, 2005 528 ft. I thought it was 0.10 miles. lets go with .10 of a mile. Its Shorter. /Phantom Tollbooth Quote Link to comment
+GrandpaKim Posted May 30, 2005 Share Posted May 30, 2005 528 ft. I thought it was 0.10 miles. lets go with .10 of a mile. Its Shorter. /Phantom Tollbooth Actually 528 feet is shorter than 0.10 miles (it's only 8 characters as opposed to 10 characters, counting spaces)! Quote Link to comment
+Tagamet Posted May 30, 2005 Share Posted May 30, 2005 528 ft. I thought it was 0.10 miles. lets go with .10 of a mile. Its Shorter. /Phantom Tollbooth Actually 528 feet is shorter than 0.10 miles (it's only 8 characters as opposed to 10 characters, counting spaces)! Not if you write UPHILL. Tagamet Quote Link to comment
+welch Posted May 30, 2005 Share Posted May 30, 2005 Wow, and I thought that I thought outside the box..... That site talks about "Virtual and Reverse Virtual (or Locationless) Caches". I'm a shrink and I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around the concept of a Locationless Cache. Cool, but very strange. It'd definitely fit in well with Quantum physics though. Tagamet your joking?? Quote Link to comment
+Tagamet Posted May 30, 2005 Share Posted May 30, 2005 Wow, and I thought that I thought outside the box..... That site talks about "Virtual and Reverse Virtual (or Locationless) Caches". I'm a shrink and I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around the concept of a Locationless Cache. Cool, but very strange. It'd definitely fit in well with Quantum physics though. Tagamet your joking?? Yes and no. The concept of a cache that has no location is a bit abstract for me. I'm just reaching for the first step on the learning ladder that is geocaching, so most of my remarks will evidence my nearly total lack of knowledge of the sport (so far). tagamet PS: I AM, however, a shrink. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.