SkyWrench Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 but I just have to ask. Anyone tried caching without a GPS? And if so, are they really successful? Just curious, cause I am a masochist, and I love my map and compass. Not that I am anti-GPS, I really love my Magellan, just really love a challenge(and I'm a sucker for mental anguish) Quote Link to comment
+cache_test_dummies Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 WaldenRun has found thousands, and generally does not use a GPSr. Quote Link to comment
+briansnat Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 WaldenRun has found thousands, and generally does not use a GPSr. Web-ling is another person who does most of his cache hunting sans GPS. It obviously can be done. I've found a few myself that way. Its probably much easier in hilly areas or other areas with a lot of terrain features. It might not be as easy in Kansas or Oaklahoma. Quote Link to comment
MagicMeeko Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 Found my first 5 without one. I got my GPSr, and my car broke down. So, 100% of cache finds have been with out a GPS. I tried one cache with my GPS, DNF. Oh, I only have 5 finds? Er uh, uh... Quote Link to comment
+Jeeping Family Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 WaldenRun has found thousands, and generally does not use a GPSr. Web-ling is another person who does most of his cache hunting sans GPS. It obviously can be done. I've found a few myself that way. Its probably much easier in hilly areas or other areas with a lot of terrain features. It might not be as easy in Kansas or Oaklahoma. Hmm, I am in Oklahoma, why would it be hard out here without a GPSr? Quote Link to comment
+briansnat Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 (edited) WaldenRun has found thousands, and generally does not use a GPSr. Web-ling is another person who does most of his cache hunting sans GPS. It obviously can be done. I've found a few myself that way. Its probably much easier in hilly areas or other areas with a lot of terrain features. It might not be as easy in Kansas or Oaklahoma. Hmm, I am in Oklahoma, why would it be hard out here without a GPSr? Well not everywhere in Oaklahoma, but much of it is flat. To help pinpoint caches without a GPS a topo map is vital. Hills, cliffs and mountains make it far easier. Since a topo map won't show many contour lines on the plains it makes it much more difficult to pinpoint a cache. Edited May 28, 2005 by briansnat Quote Link to comment
+Jeeping Family Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 Ah, you can use the subtle clues to find them also. Quote Link to comment
nobby.nobbs Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 i've solved a couple for a laugh just using the clues and starting points. just because really....makes for a little change every now and then. Quote Link to comment
+fighterthiefmage Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 Nice avatar tadpole. Quote Link to comment
lennon2004 Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 I'm relatively new to this, so I don't have a GPS yet. So far, I've found 2 out of 5 I've looked for. Hoping to get a GPS soon though. -Elizabeth Quote Link to comment
+Renegade Knight Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 I've done the no GPS thing a few times. Once with nothing but the name of the street. The hide was fairly obviouse. My first cache I only thought I knew where it was and I did not find it. Later with photo's of the general vicinity we found it about 100' over from what I had a**-U-MEd was ground zero. In a rock pile to boot. Quote Link to comment
SkyWrench Posted May 28, 2005 Author Share Posted May 28, 2005 Thanks fighterthiefmage, and it's an Aztec compass stealy--kinda combines some loves of mine. And so that settles it......I'm going to try it (with the GPS in the bag). WaldenRun and Web-ling have inspired me. Quote Link to comment
+Scoobie10 Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 My very first find was done without a GPS. It's strange how well I remember that day. Since then, I've done several without my GPS. There have to be a few elements present to be sucessful such as knowing the area well, maybe a clue, knowing what kind of container you're searching for, that sort of thing. I've found using QuakeMaps is a big help. I pull up the photo and have very good idea of where the cache is. Granted, it's not much help with a cache in the middle of the woods, but it will show you exactly which tree it's in in a cemetery. I suppose if you really wanted to get right down to it, QuakeMap could also get you pretty close even if you were hunting a cache in the woods. By using the grid marks and proper measurments, you just might be able to pinpoint a search area. Then, if someone left a hint like "under the fallen tree" you would probably stand a pretty good chance of finding it. I used that exact method to find this cache.....although, I wasn't given much choice in the matter. As it turned out, my measuring skills were pretty good that day and I came within 8 feet of the cache. Scoob Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.